Monthly Archives: December 2010

Thanking Those who Worked through Christmas

December 30, 2010

On this holiday a member of our family landed in hospital, where it was touch and go whether they'd be released for Christmas Eve. Hanging around the place that day really brought home to me how much we take for granted in terms of all the workers who bust their butts so the rest of us can have happy, stress free holidays. That perception was intensified at 6:40 a.m. on the still dark Christmas Day as I drove my handsome spouse to his job at a health care facility in town. Like him, many others went to work that day, leaving families behind to wait for shift change to start the gift opening and festivities.

 

When one family member has to work on any holiday, major discussions and revisions to plans take place to accommodate that, and when more than one family member works shifts, the quest to find a mutually agreeable time to get together becomes quite tricky. For those of us privileged to work the typical Monday to Friday 9 to 5 pm job, these considerations don't come into play and the lucky ones have no idea how hard it is just to have a family day with everybody together.

 

Not to single out health care workers, I tip my hat as well to retail workers at places like WalMart that stay open late or even 24/7 in December just to make life easy for their customers. And the staff complies, showing remarkable cheerfulness towards those who aren't always so cheerful in response. It reminded me of a short poem written by one of my favourite socialists, F.R. Scott. Here it is, taken from a book called "Poetry of our Time" edited by one Louis Dudek and published in 1966 by the Macmillan Company of Canada.

 

"Christmas Shopping

It is so nice for people to give things at Christmas,

That the stores stay open every evening till ten,

And the shop-girls celebrate the coming of Christ

By standing on their feet fourteen hours a day".

 

On that note, here's to all the hard working people doing all kinds of work with the public, work like health care, policing, government services, restaurant and retail workers. To all of them, a big thank you from one who appreciates what you give up to keep the rest of us fat and happy with our new toys. Ho Ho Ho and Happy New Year.

Sucking up to the Boss – bigtime!

December 30, 2010

This guy is the person of the year! Says who? The Agency that he leads, that's who, story here.  Pierre Karl Peladeau, The CEO of Quebecor, is the person most prominent in the economic sphere in 2010, according to respondents to a Leger Marketing poll conducted on behalf of the Agency QMI.  QMI is Quebecor Media Inc. the company that has morphed into the print Fox News of the North and the owner of one of the two local papers – NorthumberlandToday and owned by Quebecor Inc. Mr Peladeau is the CEO of QI.

 

So we have an agency run by Mr Peladeau conducting a poll to find the 'newsperson of the year' and who do they find – the Boss. This is the guy that has allowed the once proud local paper – The Cobourg Star, one of the oldest local papers in Canada – to degenerate into what it is today: a paper without credibility and respect. Just ask anybody on the street what they think and you will get streams of derision directed at the administration of the paper. It's a wonder that the product ever gets published considering just how few employees are left in the building.

 

Newspaper watchers have watched in horror as the once proud Sun Media chain has reduced printing presses, cut newsroom staff and cannibalised operations to make the almighty 30% profit margin. It has spawned a "watch site" -Toronto Sun Family: 1971 – 2010  This site regularly catalogues the deeds of the QMI and QI and SunMedia and is rarely complimentary. A month ago it printed a list of brave papers, at least five, whose editorial staff has had the temerity to publish letters that castigate the columnists occupying the op-ed page that trumpet the party line according to the NeoCon right. We wonder just how many uncomplimentary letters NToday has thrown in the trash bin?

 

So I guess if one wants to pad a CV just conduct a poll amongst "braunnosers" and you will get what you want

Tax cuts and the politics of them

December 29, 2010

This is the man in charge of taxes in Canada. He plans to give Corporations and Business owners a tax cut, reducing the Corporate tax to 16.5 per cent from 18. A further reduction to 15 per cent is set for 2012. The hit to our treasury will be about $4.5 billion. As we are in a deficit position and owe Billions this would add to the deficit. The NeoCon argument is simple – cut taxes and the people who get more money will spend it. Corporations will use the "kept" money to invest in productive capacity. These tax cuts are coming at a time when the manufacturing capacity is being crippled by a loss of market share in the US due to a rising dollar. Just how will the money be used, if in fact it is ever received as one has to make money to get a tax break, is the question of the day. When one looks at  Finance Canada’s latest projection that post-2006 tax cuts will reduce revenues by $44 billion per year when fully implemented (see the Budget Book's Table A2.2). How do we make up this loss when we are in a recession and few people are spending to produce tax revenue. Also how much will the GDP have to expand to make up this loss? Because if we have to rely on reduced spending to accommodate the $44Billion loss to the Treasury then we have shifted the base for the argument.

 

In the everlasting argument of the efficiency of tax cuts – do they stimulate economic activity – we have reams of evidence to show that little of the extra money that circulates actually does create jobs. Google "Bush tax cuts" and all kinds of opinions pop up. We at the BurdReport are after the reasons why people believe one way or another and if the reasoning is based on the "herd mentality" of both sides of the argument. In other words is the belief that tax cuts produce jobs or tax cuts just cut the available amount of money needed to fund social programs ideological or rational?

 

So think about this folks and comment!

Rise Up Now to Protect Canada Pension Plan

December 28, 2010

Troubling new signals are emerging that our Canada Pension Plan is again at risk. It seems our treacherous Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, has back tracked from his promise, made just a few months ago, to keep the Canada Pension Plan strong by gradually increasing premiums over the next few years. Back then, only Alberta opposed this strategy, but now just six provinces remain on side, with Ontario for once taking the lead in speaking up to protect Canadian workers' basic retirement pension.

 

What's changed since then? A fierce lobbying effort by the banks, insurance and investment industries, who smell an opportunity to make a buck with this new scheme they've sold to Flaherty. Called the Pooled Registered Pension Plan, it would be privately run by those same institutions who would charge fees to the Canadians who can afford to join. It's a good thing it would be voluntary since only one in four of us have RRSPs, suggesting many of us couldn't afford to participate in this new scheme. Most of us know it too, since a recent Environics poll found 78% of Canadians agree that a gradual rise in CPP premiums is both needed and wanted. Meanwhile Flaherty has proclaimed that even a modest premium increase would threaten the economic recovery.

 

Looking down the road though, it seems obvious that allowing the country's basic retirement program for the elderly to fall apart just when the ranks of the elderly are starting to swell, doesn't seem like such a good move either. Surely we need to protect the security of all of us, not just the ones affluent enough to fund their own retirement. Right now there are 1.6 million seniors living on incomes below $16,000 annually. These are the people who actually depend on their Canada Pensions after paying those premiums since the program started in 1966. We must not abandon them now, or any of the multitude of workers ready to retire and start collecting the benefits they have been promised.

 

This week the talks will continue between the feds and provinces, with the fate of our CPP depending on the outcome later this year. It just might be a good time for us to call up Rick Norlock and let him know we want all Canadians to have a secure old age, not just the rich ones who can afford privately run programs. The Federation of Canadian Municipalities think so, don't you too?

Two commentaries and a call for more

December 28, 2010

A grim start to the new Year's prognostications. This one is from our pal/seer Chris Hedges published in Truthdig.com. Titled 2011 – A Brave New Dystopia. Read it here.

 

Turning to the Oxford dictionary online "dystopia" is defined as: an imagined place or state in which everything is unpleasant or bad, typically a totalitarian or environmentally degraded one. The opposite of Utopia

 

Wikipedia gives us a larger definition that appears to be tailored to the article: A dystopia (from Ancient Greek: δυσ-: bad-, ill- and Ancient Greek: τ?πος: place, landscape) (alternatively, cacotopia,[1] or anti-utopia) is, in literature, an often futuristic society that has degraded into a repressive and controlled state, often under the guise of being utopian. Dystopian literature has underlying cautionary tones, warning society that if we continue to live how we do, this will be the consequence. A dystopia, thus, is regarded as a sort of negative utopia and is often characterized by an authoritarian or totalitarian form of government. Dystopias usually feature different kinds of repressive social control systems, a lack or total absence of individual freedoms and expressions and constant states of warfare or violence. Dystopias often explore the concept of technology going "too far" and how humans individually and en masse use technology. A dystopian society is also often characterized by mass poverty for most of its inhabitants and a large military-like police force.


Here's another one from Rafe Mair,  Bio, Blog published in The Tyee titled: "Why I'm Liberal, Yet Not a Liberal" A very thoughtful piece.

 

 


 

Now for a New Year's challenge, send us your favourite prediction or commentary and we can display the complete range of opinions held by the BR Nation.

A Christmas wish granted

December 26, 2010

 

It's here – amalgamation and cooperation at last – must be Christmas!   Click on the headline to enlarge pic and read the cutline for the punchline.

G20 aftermath

December 23, 2010

Now that the recent G20 conference issues have moved into the enquiry stage, at least five or six on the go, much hot air and punditry will take place about the problems that arose. The big problems, at first were the huge numbers of people being arrested and their treatment after arrest, then came the furor about the "secret law" that the Provincial Cabinet proclaimed but didn't tell anybody they had. After that came the SIU report that told all that Police had been guilty of brutality but nobody could be charged because none of the perps were identifiable. That produced a public reaction and more video from bystanders. The SIU reopened the case of Adam Nobody and this week charged a Toronto policeman as he had been identified by another cop, story here.

 

Everyone has an opinion – just listen to the airwaves. From the people who blame the arrested, "They should have known that being down there would get them arrested" to the libertarians who say, "We have the right to assemble anywhere we want without fear of arrest." But anger may be misplaced. Take for example the law, passed in secret, that allowed arrest of anyone within 5ms of the fence. It was available to be used but the law that was used to arrest thousands was an existing law – Breaching the Peace and likely to commit a crime. Are the people ticked off at the McGuinty Cabinet for passing a secret law or are they ticked about a similar law being used to arrest people? The law used by the Police – likely to commit a breach of peace – is still there and hardly any comment has been directed at that. Why not?

 

Yesterday afternoon the Charles Adler Show – the favourite choice of Canadian Limburghers – was being hosted by Roy Green. He had on the usual cheerleader from the Toronto Sun – Joe Warmington and they both agreed that the Police activity should be investigated. Now what has prompted these two to demand enquiries? They are demonstrating an adroit ability to straddle a fence without crushing their gonads. In the case of Green he can't believe the process - "That 15 police officers were named as possibly having been involved in causing injury to Mr. Nobody and that 12 of those officers were designated as witnesses, yet not one was able to identify anyone in the amateur video taken of police action against Adam Nobody is in a word, unbelievable." Warmington, who never criticises the Police is content to appear to join the criticism, calling for a Public Enquiry, and coming down hard on the Chief of Police – Bill Blair.

 

What appears to be hypocrisy in all of these "law and order" types now piling on to remain populist is that when the event was unfolding these same people couldn't hit the protesters hard enough. Now that public sentiment has turned its angry voices to identifiable objects – Bill Blair, McGuinty and his secret law – both misplaced as Bill Blair wasn't in charge and the secret law wasn't the problem, these same commentators want in on it. So they are now criticising the aftermath but not the real problems.

What does control of the Senate mean?

December 21, 2010

PM Harper now has, by appointing two "no-names" to the Senate, a majority in that Chamber. But, what does that mean? Not much immediately, as he had control for the last couple of months – witness the killing of a bill without debate last month – but the reality is he can now do what he wants with the Senate. The Senate can enact Bills of a non-monetary nature, that means that unless the opposition can persuade the Speaker of the Senate that a Bill has a monetary implication be prepared for an onslaught of "Social" Bills. Anti-crime bills, Abortion Bills, anti-gay Bills in fact all Bills that will be red-meat to the masses of his base. Watch for the influence of the Rev. McVety and the Evangelicals to be reflected in new Bills designed to "protect the family" and combat the "social engineering" ways of the left and progressives.

 

With an election looming in the Spring watch for many of these Bills to be introduced and sit there as the Senate debates them. The object of the introduction will not be the passing of them but to be a barrage of debate; pre-election publicity. But there is a downside to Mr Harper's stacking of the Senate as an election issue. If the Libs have any brains, or money, there will ads depicting Mr Harper in one or more of his now famous quotes about the rottenness of the Senate, that he made when in opposition, the most famous being a vow not to stack the Senate with appointed people, and directly call him a Liar, confirm the mistrust that the public has of him.

 

Speaking of Liars how about that Jim Flaherty. "I am not in favour of setting up a brand bureaucracy to administer a new CPP" Uttered in response to questions about his opposition to a plan to enlarge the CPP. He wants to set up a new bureaucracy to persuade citizens to put their pension money into a scheme that would make the Insurance Industry very rich on management fees and commissions. The Liar charge comes as a result of looking at the proposal to enlarge the CPP and discover that very few more people would be needed to administer any increase in deductions. But funny that he doesn't think his plan would do the same.

 

But back to the headline – "What does control of the Senate mean?" Mr Harper has a reputation for being a political chess player. That means he is always four moves ahead of the opponents. This stacking of the Senate is an insurance policy for the possibility that he is in opposition next time. His Con Senate can block any legislation that his opponents produce. He is looking ahead on this one!

 

Cobourg Poet Laureate On The Move

December 20, 2010

A guest post: Wally Keeler

Units of verse of Cobourg’s poetry circles and triangles are abuzz with news that Cobourg’s recently installed Poet Laureate, Jill Battson, is moving out of Cobourg to pursue her dynamic career of creativity elsewhere. Appointed Poet Laureate August, 2010, Cobourg hardly had time to get to know and enjoy her considerable poetic talents.

 

Recall that Eric Winter was Cobourg’s first Poet Laureate, appointed July 21, 1997, and after fruitful service to the poetic arts in Cobourg, he resigned in 2010, to make way for Jill Battson, who had recently moved to Cobourg only months before.

 

The Town of Cobourg delineated the DUTIES of Cobourg Poet Laureate; “The Poet Laureate acts as a literary ambassador for the Town of Cobourg. The Poet Laureate also appears during the year at some of the Town’s public events like the Mayor’s Levy, and Canada Day as well as special openings or celebrations. The Poet Laureate serves as an advocate for literature and participates in the strong and thriving literary life of our Town. Her efforts ensure that our community encourages self-expression by youth through spoken word and written poetry. As well, the Poet Laureate will create a legacy project to enhance our Town’s literary voices and support the other Arts.”

 

Jill Battson’s legacy project is the anthology, The Poetic Spirit of Northumberland, which will contain poetry and complimentary photography. Northumberland Today has collaborated with Ms Battson on this project and has provided a weekly column featuring a poem destined for this anthology.

 

One of the drawbacks of a Poet Laureate with only a few months of familiarity of the local community, is the shallowness of her participation in a Cobourg event, most notably the celebration of the 150th anniversary of Victoria Hall. Organized by the Cobourg Poetry Workshop (CPW), none of the performed poems had any reference to Victoria Hall, nor even to Cobourg. One of the participating poets for this specific Cobourg event hailed from Port Hope.

 

The selected poems performed at that function were written by British, American Canadian poets, but no Cobourg poets. It raises the question whether the CPW had obtained copyright permission to recite these poems at a public function. They certainly acted fast to take down this video extolling themselves at this public event held in a public building at public expense.

 

At the recent inauguration of Cobourg Town Council, Jill Battson chose to recite the poem, Courage, written by USAmerican poet, Anne Sexton. On her blog, Poet Bureau, she posted her comment, “I'll be reading a poem at Mayor Gil Brocanier's inauguration in Cobourg – not one of mine, but I could have written one in the time it took me to research one!” Yes, she could have, but didn’t. 

 

Jill Battson was nominated to Cobourg Town Council by the CPW.  The departure of Jill Battson raises some interesting questions, not just the vetting competency of CPW.   

 

Does the ‘office’ of Cobourg Poet Laureate require the Poet to be resident in Cobourg? Can a poet retain their title as Laureate for several years while living and working fulltime in another community? Can a poet parachute into a community to become Poet Laureate, then move out months later to pursue their career of creativity? Of course.

 

It is an interesting dilemma as Cobourg Poet Laureate, Jill Battson, prepares to move out of town. Will she be able to complete her term if she decides not to resign. Will Cobourg want her to complete her four year term as an absentee Poet Laureate?

 

If she resigns, who will replace her? Does the CPW have a poet-in-waiting? Will their chosen nominee this time be more Cobourg-connected? It would seem to be a no-brainer that recent Governor-General Award recipient, Richard Greene would fit the bill. Although employed in Toronto, he is a long time resident of Cobourg.

 

He wears suits and ties very well. A quiet academic, Richard Greene may well be what Cobourg needs to put pizzazz into the Cobourg Poetry scene.

 

But then again, by default, the CPW has made itself the only nominator of Poet Laureates in Cobourg. Perhaps several names should be nominated and the people of Cobourg can poeticipate in their election. An election for Poet Laureate – now that would be a unique situation.

 

Why Charity Doesn’t Fix Problems

December 19, 2010

Years ago, as a fledgling activist, I came across a little story called "The Upstream Parable". It makes the point, beautifully, that we need to look beyond sticking band-aids on problems to find the cause and fix that instead. With the charitable season in full swing this is the perfect time to share it with our readers here at the BR.

 

As the parable begins we have a group of villagers working by a river when one of them sees a baby floating downstream. A woman rescues the infant and takes it home to care for it. Next day, two more babies were found in the river and resuced. On the third day there were three babies, and before long a steady stream of babies floated downstream every day. Soon the whole village was involved in pulling them out and looking after them. The whole town was filled with babies needing care.

 

One day, somebody decided it would be a good idea to go upstream to find out who was throwing all these babies into the water. A huge controversy erupted, with one side arguing that every possible hand was needed to save the babies since there were so many of them. The other group argued that if they found out who was throwing them into the river, they could stop them and they wouldn't need to save and raise these babies anymore.

 

Our story ends there, without resolution. The argument isn't over yet. As the gap between the wealthy and those at the bottom becomes bigger, we have more victims of poverty needing rescue every day, and the costs of paying people to stick on band-aids keep soaring. Service providers, the professional bleeding hearts, insist that we can't let people starve, we must DO something, even if it only stops the pain for a brief time. Activists, the radicals in our midst, decry the waste of both resources and human potential when we ignore the systemic causes of societal misery and focus on short term remedies instead.

 

Clearly we can't just abandon people, especially children. But the thought of a whole generation of kids growing up eating from the food bank isn't palatable either. It may be easier to donate to charity and volunteer to help, but that approach does little to address the reasons people need charity in the first place. And, while providing emergency assistance is necessary, if we let ourselves become entirely focused on that to the detriment of addressing the causes, it only perpetuates the problem. One thing is clear, it allows government to abandon their responsibilities to the volunteer and faith based groups who are ill equiped to meet the overwhelming need.

 

If you are one of those kind souls who donate time or money to help out, good for you. We need you. But please, add one more item to your To Do list: write to your Mayor, your County Warden, your MPP and your MP and tell them to stop hiding from poverty and the poor and take action to provide real opportunities for them to have a decent life. If all of us did that, we might just be surprised at the results. Sticking on band aids will only get us so far, and that is nowhere at all.

RSS CBC livefeed

RSS Toronto Star feed

  • Toronto Catholic school board rejects call for ban on gay-straight alliances
    The Toronto Catholic District School Board has rejected a call from two trustees to ban gay-straight alliances in schools — which Ontario now says schools must allow.Trustees voted 7 to 4 against a motion Thursday by trustee Garry Tanuan calling on the board to defy Ontario’s year-old Accepting Schools Act that says boards must let students set up gay-straig […]
  • Bridge collapses into river in Washington state
    MOUNT VERNON, WASH. — An Interstate 5 bridge over a river north of Seattle collapsed Thursday evening, dumping vehicles and people into the water, the Washington State Patrol said.The four-lane bridge over the Skagit River collapsed about 7 p.m., Trooper Mark Francis said. There was no immediate estimate of how many people were in the water or whether there […]
  • Toronto Blue Jays blast Baltimore Orioles
    Anthony Gose found himself in the Jays-Orioles tilt Thursday night with some of the top young players in the game.There was doughnut-munching Orioles pitcher Kevin Gausman making his major league debut and Baltimore third baseman Manny Machado, who is leading the majors in doubles.PHOTOS:Blue Jays vs. OriolesGose has amazing speed and is easily the Jays’ top […]
  • SNC-Lavalin offered VP post to Moammar Gadhafi’s son in 2008
    MONTREAL—Canadian engineering giant SNC-Lavalin offered an executive post to the son of former Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi in 2008, according court documents cited by the CBC.The broadcaster report based on an RCMP affidavit that was used to raid the company’s Montreal headquarters in an international bribery investigation in April 2012, said Saadi Gadhafi […]
  • Rob Ford crack scandal: Gawker’s ‘Crackstarter’ campaign hits snag as it nears $200,000 goal, editor says
    Two important developments happened Thursday night in Gawker’s Rob Ford “Crackstarter” campaign: someone donated $10,000, and editor John Cook admitted he hasn’t been able to get in touch with the owner of the alleged Ford crack video since Sunday.The U.S. website’s crowd-funding campaign is seeking to buy the smartphone video that allegedly shows Toronto Ma […]