tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post116344961134620890..comments2007-03-22T19:06:15.213-04:00Ben Burdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06372169478978720740ben@eagle.caBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-1163633098460091392006-11-15T18:24:00.000-05:002006-11-15T18:24:00.000-05:00Well I voted today at the Columbus Centre and it took 3/4 of an hour because<BR/>each letter had to be entered into a computer 'to prevent fraud'. If I had<BR/>not brought my letter I would have been taken to the head of the enormous<BR/>line and been allowed to vote showing photo ID. Where's the sense in that?<BR/>So I don't think much of computers helping to speed up voting so far. And<BR/>what about potential hackers? They are entirely possible despite what Bob<BR/>Spooner tried to tell me. My own son-in-law who has a software business had<BR/>a hacker from the middle east wreck his whole data base and it took 23<BR/>straight hours to fix it. I think paper voting is the way to go. Period.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com