tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post297705949496024242..comments2010-01-19T06:54:17.657-05:00Ben Burdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06372169478978720740ben@eagle.caBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-17920956343439256042010-01-18T20:38:10.165-05:002010-01-18T20:38:10.165-05:00PUBLIC MEETING RE THE BEACH:<br /><br />Tuesday, January 19th at 5 pm<br />Old Bailey Courtroom.<br /><br />For those of us who don&#39;t want to see our beach and park turned into a gated community.Deb Onoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-39888510820981244632010-01-17T21:57:22.235-05:002010-01-17T21:57:22.235-05:00Therein lies the problem, Area C has only two appllications in the pipeline before 2006, those will be the ones that proceed, I am told. very small area indeed inside a much larger greenfield in which only 88 hectares and 3400 people can use. With a potential population of 11,000 that can be accomodated inside the &quot;built boundary&quot; it is obvious that area C is a dinosoar!Ben Burdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06372169478978720740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-3826558191882495092010-01-17T21:20:40.105-05:002010-01-17T21:20:40.105-05:00I believe that the Area c Section of the Town, has been approved before the new Planning Review and Places to Grow regulations became law. This would tell me that the additional growth would not be affected by these new regulations.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com