tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post8682345071318084578..comments2009-10-14T12:12:59.778-04:00Comments on The Burd Report: Just wondering?Ben Burdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06372169478978720740ben@eagle.caBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-38836419251989509482009-10-13T11:53:26.423-04:002009-10-13T11:53:26.423-04:00Ok, now it all makes sense. Keeler got hosed by h...Ok, now it all makes sense. Keeler got hosed by his ex-wife and now he has a bitter and miserable outlook on life. <br /><br />Martin's post was by far the most considered. Why must everyone jump to conclusions instead of carefully considering the circumstances?<br /><br />Deb O., simmer down with the sweeping generalizations. Are all poor people as bitter and miserable as you and Wally? I can answer that one ... Nope! I have nothing against anyone that has accumulated or inherited wealth even though I have not. Some of my close friends are quite well off, two of them are doctors and they are all kind, warm and considerate people.Billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-63921094950804674192009-10-12T14:01:17.853-04:002009-10-12T14:01:17.853-04:00It's ok. You answered elsewhere: bankrupted by...It's ok. You answered elsewhere: bankrupted by an ex-wife. Winner-ex = loser Wally. Question should be: how much treasure did your ex-wife accummulate? <br />Better question: why do you make the sweeping generalization that all others posting on this blog are losers?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-41442248325804259392009-10-12T12:37:30.259-04:002009-10-12T12:37:30.259-04:00Depends on who is asking Anony Mouse.Depends on who is asking Anony Mouse.Wally Keelerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02370532557074561490noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-68096241386701039592009-10-12T08:52:47.544-04:002009-10-12T08:52:47.544-04:00How much treasure have you accumulated, winner Wal...How much treasure have you accumulated, winner Wally?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-62136113864734914382009-10-10T14:04:32.559-04:002009-10-10T14:04:32.559-04:00I think the government told the courts to let him ...I think the government told the courts to let him off with just a fine ,so they could get some money, because of the Lady's appeal that will show the government that this will not pass the bill of rights.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-43937003315910570832009-10-09T15:59:34.637-04:002009-10-09T15:59:34.637-04:00Those in uniform looking after others in uniform? ...Those in uniform looking after others in uniform? Leaving him to walk and suspending his licence is hardly looking out for him. With friends like that who needs enemies?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-21814098040359234302009-10-09T15:58:32.426-04:002009-10-09T15:58:32.426-04:00I don't disagree at all. I just don't see ...I don't disagree at all. I just don't see in this case how it involves the police, who just did their job. How about the politically appointed Justices of the Peace. Who with no formal legal training render these outrageous decisions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-12177458143016593882009-10-09T11:39:00.026-04:002009-10-09T11:39:00.026-04:00Anon. must be the same person who was defending do...Anon. must be the same person who was defending doctors who exclude the poor from their patient list.<br /><br />I am sure the privileged ones s/he worships appreciate his/her devotion to their inflated sense of entitlement. It would be so unseemly if they had to stick up for themselves without lackeys like our Anon. to do it for them.Deb Onoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-77780670859198205632009-10-09T11:36:38.963-04:002009-10-09T11:36:38.963-04:00How about the presumption of innocence?
From all ...How about the presumption of innocence?<br /><br />From all the comments here, we have the smug righteousness of people suggesting that the arresting officer was unethically and immorally letting a fellow goverment official off light than he should. And there is the smug righteousness of impuning the justice system with the suggestion that behind the scenes they are obtaining information on the accused's income so that they can deliver a penalty appropriate to the treasure the accused retains.<br /><br />The bunch of you are a crock with exceedingly little sense of justice -- only your prejudice against those who have acquired more treasure than the lot of you losers. The bunch of you would be a mirror image of the injustice of the system, because I suspect you'd throw the book at him, max it out, why? Because he has a uniform and money. Pathetic prejudice.<br /><br />As far as equality before the law is concerned, there is equality before the public -- which explains the cowards flying their prejudiced opinions behind anonymity -- perhaps judges should mete out justice behind anonymity also.Wally Keelerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02370532557074561490noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-69964635294457978662009-10-09T10:57:31.356-04:002009-10-09T10:57:31.356-04:00It's hard without being in court to know exact...It's hard without being in court to know exactly what happened but my understanding of the evidence is that the measured speed was exactly 50 over the limit and the driver was trying to get to a funeral on time. By the time of the hearing, the driver had already suffered the loss of his vehicle for a period of time and all the other consequences of being charged. In everyday court proceedings I think most of us, client or counsel, would see the logic in, indeed expect, a potential softening of the charge in these circumstances. For one thing, it might be hard for the state to prove that the speed was truly 50 over. I have seen nothing to suggest that this accused got special consideration because of his professional position; on the contrary, because of the public nature of the case he has probably taken more of a beating than most, and any objectives of specific and general deterrence probably have been achieved.Martin Partridgenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-67434233809741890732009-10-09T10:14:19.847-04:002009-10-09T10:14:19.847-04:00how about the perception of equality before the la...how about the perception of equality before the lawBen Burdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06372169478978720740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-90828496017833309792009-10-09T10:04:18.519-04:002009-10-09T10:04:18.519-04:00The police charged him, the courts lowered the fin...The police charged him, the courts lowered the fine. How about some unbiased comments!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23948057.post-50132050664802239142009-10-08T11:09:18.590-04:002009-10-08T11:09:18.590-04:00When the cop pulled him over did he ask facetiousl...When the cop pulled him over did he ask facetiously "Where's the fire?"<br /><br />But you're right of course, Ben. There`s a law for the rich and a law for the poor and those in uniform look after those in uniform -even if it ain`t the same uniform.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com