Only in America you say!
Interesting stuff here about ways to deter protesters, maybe Cobourg Council could get a copy White House Manual Details How to Deal With Protesters - washingtonpost.com
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Up pops the OPP guy again
Lookee here Kenora OPP report uses Port Hope as an example. The OPP guy, who is doing the local Policing Study , has another gig in Kenora, apparently analyzing policing costs up there. Wonder of wonders he is quick to point out just efficient the OPP is compared to other Municipal Forces. When are we going to call his bluff and ask if he can be impartial when he is indoctrinated in the ways of the OPP and is sitting on a full pay OPP pension.
Monday, August 20, 2007
Work for your reading!
Professor Rob Washburn has posted an opinion about that Economic Development and the recent election splash of Fiberal money by Loo. Read it here
This is my answer to him
"You are so right Economic development is a mantra repeated by the ignorant of ignorant politicians trying to impress the unwashed. The lack of accounting of the millions (at least 50) doled out in the last few years to Eastern Ontario, in the name of Economic Development, is a bloody scandal. How many projects never see the light of day after the first grant? How many projects are pet projects of favoured agencies and how many projects are local government projects that should have been funded by another level of government?
And more importantly how many times do we have to fund the investigation of valuable issues that never get funding after the initial grant. Transportation and High Speed Internet Access come to mind immediately. We fund the favoured agency to do a study and then fail to fund the operation of the study. Why because they study unsustainable projects and then refuse to fund them because they fail to find partners to sustain them. Kafka would have loved it. Meanwhile because it is done in the name of Economic Development money can be pissed away!!"
BTW this post is an effort to create linkages between online posts tell me if you like it and maybe we can explore the world of online posts together. ben
This is my answer to him
"You are so right Economic development is a mantra repeated by the ignorant of ignorant politicians trying to impress the unwashed. The lack of accounting of the millions (at least 50) doled out in the last few years to Eastern Ontario, in the name of Economic Development, is a bloody scandal. How many projects never see the light of day after the first grant? How many projects are pet projects of favoured agencies and how many projects are local government projects that should have been funded by another level of government?
And more importantly how many times do we have to fund the investigation of valuable issues that never get funding after the initial grant. Transportation and High Speed Internet Access come to mind immediately. We fund the favoured agency to do a study and then fail to fund the operation of the study. Why because they study unsustainable projects and then refuse to fund them because they fail to find partners to sustain them. Kafka would have loved it. Meanwhile because it is done in the name of Economic Development money can be pissed away!!"
BTW this post is an effort to create linkages between online posts tell me if you like it and maybe we can explore the world of online posts together. ben
Friday, August 17, 2007
Thursday, August 16, 2007
A story from the Globe about yesterdays topic Is Wikipedia becoming a hub for propaganda?
Read this about computers in the House of Commons editing wikipedia. globeandmail.com: Is Wikipedia becoming a hub for propaganda? You may ask why get worked up about this or even mention such a "minor" story. Well it's not, it is the rewriting of history and definition to suit ones side. What is worse is that it is being done by the government on our money.
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
Somebody with waaay too much time on their hands sent me this
I really don't know what to make of this one here
Now for the real analysis
The dust has settled and the decision made and now all Cobourgers have to do is wait for the tenders to come in and Council votes on them and we will be the proud owners of a Fountain/Rink facility at the harbourfront.
According to my sources I didn't miss much by not being at the Council meeting on Monday. About 200 people filled the concert hall to listen to delegations give their opinions. One quoted proponent proceeded to insult everybody in the place by sayng they are part of history, going to die in ten years and therefore are ignoring the needs of the young. Also proceeding to slam the dissenting councillors as involved in pettiness and harbour ambitions. Wonder what she would have said about the supporting councillors if they deigned to upset her? The opponents spoke about new information and process but to no avail - the votes were not going to change.
I am wondering after all of this just what would have come out of another public meeting if the votes were so entrenched. Not much as the opponents would have still not been satisfied if votes did not change.
My final opinion about his is simple, why not harness the anger and energy to come up with another project, involving fitness - thereby keeping the fitness money, and start the process of putting another IcePad/Arena together. Let's do something positive with the money and energy and time of the opponents and work with Council to put another arena in Town. 1.3 million is a helluva of a seed! We know the people opposed to the project are healthy, resourceful and willing - give them some work to do. Work with Councillors and make them show us they can do more than say no and sit on their fat arses.
Just my two cents
According to my sources I didn't miss much by not being at the Council meeting on Monday. About 200 people filled the concert hall to listen to delegations give their opinions. One quoted proponent proceeded to insult everybody in the place by sayng they are part of history, going to die in ten years and therefore are ignoring the needs of the young. Also proceeding to slam the dissenting councillors as involved in pettiness and harbour ambitions. Wonder what she would have said about the supporting councillors if they deigned to upset her? The opponents spoke about new information and process but to no avail - the votes were not going to change.
I am wondering after all of this just what would have come out of another public meeting if the votes were so entrenched. Not much as the opponents would have still not been satisfied if votes did not change.
My final opinion about his is simple, why not harness the anger and energy to come up with another project, involving fitness - thereby keeping the fitness money, and start the process of putting another IcePad/Arena together. Let's do something positive with the money and energy and time of the opponents and work with Council to put another arena in Town. 1.3 million is a helluva of a seed! We know the people opposed to the project are healthy, resourceful and willing - give them some work to do. Work with Councillors and make them show us they can do more than say no and sit on their fat arses.
Just my two cents
Companies and party aides cast censorious eye over Wikipedia
The good guys tend to win most of the time! Wikipedia is an online encyclopaedia and is composed of definitions submitted by us (the onliners). But submissions can be edited by anyone and that has been the source of this controversy. Normally past blowups have been about differing opinions of the same definition but here we discover the rewriting of history to make the participants look good. We can't change that but we can track what they are up to and expose them. click here for more
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Cobourg makes the bigs
Cobourg's squabble over the Fountain/Rink has made page 8 of the Globe &Mail (Canada' National paper) today here. In a very generic piece the G&M lays out the contretemps in bare bones fashion. This will probably annoy the people who contacted the paper and supplied reams of background . But as they say in the publicity business, never turn down free stuff and make sure they spell my name right - all publicity is good publicity. But some will see this as dirty laundry not to be aired outside Elgin St.
Only doing half the job!
Now that the Fiberals and the Harpocrits have adopted the abominable American practice of fixed election dates and imposing them on the Municipalities the cry for the other part of the equation is becoming stronger. I refer to the practice of recall or impeachment. This is an essential part of American democracy but somehow got left out when the idea of fixed terms was imported.
Both here in Cobourg, and more often in Toronto: where the Mayor has become rather unpopular very quickly, critics are bemoaning the lack of a recall procedure. This is valid, especially in Municipal politics. Four year terms are horrendous for local democracy as we see in Cobourg where four dead white men, five if you count the Mayor, are obstinately disregarding the appeals of the great unwashed - and not just on the FRINK issue but everything else. I did read that the Mayor was recently booed at a public function - that must have been very unsettling both for public decorum and the imperial ego of PD. Incidentally when thee year terms were instituted in the 80s I spoke against it. Local politics is the most responsive level of government and should be electorally responsible as well. Two year terms should be the norm and any politician who says they need that long to learn the job should be sent to the slow learner class and dismissed.
In real terms a recall operation is very expensive and time consuming and usually fails to unseat the incumbent but McGuinty, or his soon to be successor, must add it to the Act that covers elections. After all it's only fair, but then what's fair these days?
Both here in Cobourg, and more often in Toronto: where the Mayor has become rather unpopular very quickly, critics are bemoaning the lack of a recall procedure. This is valid, especially in Municipal politics. Four year terms are horrendous for local democracy as we see in Cobourg where four dead white men, five if you count the Mayor, are obstinately disregarding the appeals of the great unwashed - and not just on the FRINK issue but everything else. I did read that the Mayor was recently booed at a public function - that must have been very unsettling both for public decorum and the imperial ego of PD. Incidentally when thee year terms were instituted in the 80s I spoke against it. Local politics is the most responsive level of government and should be electorally responsible as well. Two year terms should be the norm and any politician who says they need that long to learn the job should be sent to the slow learner class and dismissed.
In real terms a recall operation is very expensive and time consuming and usually fails to unseat the incumbent but McGuinty, or his soon to be successor, must add it to the Act that covers elections. After all it's only fair, but then what's fair these days?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)