Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Not wanting to be redundant, you know where I stand on this
This article, by Terence Corcoran of the NP does it for me - a different POV. Questioning all of the conventional wisdom and laying out the composition of Obama's auto team with their competing interests made me wonder, as others do, just what does Obama want for the engine of the American economy.
BTW I have posted all of the 42 minute 30 seconds of George Gallways speech made to Canadians last night. Look on the video page here.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
8:33 AM
0
comments
Monday, March 30, 2009
So now it's down to Legacy Costs
Besides how come the simple alternatives are never considered? For example we may have all received this email
This was an article from the St. Petersburg Times Newspaper on Sunday. The Business Section asked readers for ideas on "How Would You Fix the Economy?"
I thought this was the BEST idea. I think this guy nailed it!
Dear Mr.President,
Patriotic retirement:There are about 40 million people over 50 in the work force; pay them $1 million a piece severance with stipulations:
1) They leave their jobs. Forty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.
2) They buy NEW American cars. Forty million cars ordered - Auto Industry fixed.
3) They either buy a house or pay off their mortgage- Housing Crisis fixed.
All this and it's still cheaper than the "bailout".
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
12:54 PM
2
comments
A real potpourri
So did you put your lights out on Saturday? I have refrained from writing about earth day as it is a PR stunt designed to make the participants look good. How many of the participants have actually reduced their consumption in the last couple of years? Earth day, like womens' day and other festivals should be an everyday thing not a flash in the pan appearance.
The Greens have a Federal candidate. Stan Grizzle has been nominated. This fellow has been a member of three of the five main parties, and run for nominations in two. Wonder what he wants to be in later life. But as they say "Variety is the spice of life"
Will Brighton join the other paranoic municipalities by installing CCTV in their downtown. Research has shown that CCTV does not reduce crime, it barely makes crime-solving possible and usually the camera operators spend their working time looking for public nudity and sex acts. But if it makes Brightonians feel better let them go for it. I just hope that the signs advertising the presence of CCTV are large enough to alert those of us who don't like them to stay away.
Cobourg has reopened the debate about Development Fees. The Cobourg Home Builders Association has approached Council and asked them to reexamine the fees. The CHBA has decided that DFs are an impediment to progress and are stopping home sales, despite the recession. I would disagree and say that DFs are good and probably not high enough. New development must be paid for by new residents not existing taxpayers. I see this request is part of the ongoing discussion centreing around the Official Plan. In this discussion, which has yet to be resolved, the "Places to Grow" document at the County level has to be reconciled with the aspirations of Cobourg to plan for 16,000 more residents, despite Cobourg having the ability to "infill" inside thie present boundaries, with the potential of 9,000 residents.
A link from Wally Keeler. Wally sent an email that details some articles of local relevence Here.
Congratulations. These young people are champs - well done!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
8:30 AM
0
comments
Friday, March 27, 2009
Another idea goes down well in the Dutch Oven
Remember the posts about newspapers last week? Well here is another look. It comes from David Sirota who is the best-selling author of the books “Hostile Takeover” (2006) and “The Uprising” (2008). He is a fellow at the Campaign for America’s Future. Find his blog at OpenLeft.com or e-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com. He argues that the woes of the news industry are self-inflicted.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:29 AM
4
comments
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Ok now the time for the bean counters
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
9:16 AM
1 comments
The truth will out!

Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:08 AM
9
comments
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Advise to the mayor
Just like this one:
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
9:54 AM
0
comments
The BBC says that the Jewish Defense league asked for the Galloway ban
As usual Jason Kenney is blaming the Canadian Border Security Agency, once again begging the question who tipped off the CBSC about the visit of a UK citizen that requires no visa or advance permission.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:20 AM
3
comments
Monday, March 23, 2009
Not much this Monday morning
So Iggy wants to do something with EI. A goodplace to start would be to undo the changes that the Libs implemented in the 90s. This story explains that changing EI is a "Priority". "People are shedding jobs like crazy," Mr. Ignatieff said on CTV's Question Period. "We've got to have a government that steps in and says 'Let's put some floor under this. Let's give people an employment insurance system that allows them to get training for new jobs.' "
Question for Iggy. How do you train the older worker with limited education. Talking to a service worker this week about this very issue she told me there is not much for those folk, factory workers with long-term attachments - in the system. besides training for what. Does anybody know what jobs are going to be needed in the next fifteen years? We don't have a national jobs inventory or a succession planning policy. besides does anybody share my scepticism about the need for wholesale post-secondary education. The only use for a degree these days is to be used as a screening device to reduce the number of applicants for any vacant job!
Randy Hillier (who's he?) may want to be the top dog PC. Randy Hillier a person that scares the living crap out of the Toronto pundits is mulling a run at the vacant PC leadership position. Bring it on! All it will do is widen the political spectrum to its natural environment in a three party Legislature. PC on the right, Dalton on the centre-right and the Dippers on the left. A good pole position for the next election.
Monday evening the Cobourg Council will move to establish the D'Arcy St. location for the Community Centre. This is the last piece of the puzzle that needs to fall into place for the application for "stimulus (shovel-ready) funding". This $30 million dollar plus project is going to be sold to us as the biggest bargoon of the Century and as taxpayers we would be foolish to speak against it. Hey it's a gift from the recession gods. 33 cent dollars falling from the sky. Never mind the questions: why pay for the lawn Bowling Club to be there, how much will it cost to compensate the Cobourg Soccer Club for its lost pitches, why no swimming pool when there is demonstrated demand, etc? We will be informed in due course and asked for a stamp of approval and you can all be present at the opening of the Peter Delanty Community Centre at about the time of October 2010 (next election campaign and woe betide any candidate that doesn't support the magnificance!).
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
6:47 AM
3
comments
Sunday, March 22, 2009
When has this guy won?
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
11:07 AM
0
comments
Saturday, March 21, 2009
First point to George
I love the words being used in this dispute firstly Kenney's spokesman Alykhan Velshi (the xenophobes would have a field day with that name) said, 'We're going to uphold the law, not give special treatment to this infandous (*'infandous: too odious to be expressed or mentioned) street-corner Cromwell who actually brags about giving 'financial support' to Hamas, a terrorist organisation banned in Canada. I'm sure Galloway has a large Rolodex of friends in regimes elsewhere in the world willing to roll out the red carpet for him. Canada, however, won't be one of them.'
It should be noted that the financial support given to Hamas was humanitarian aid.
Then the response from Galloway, "Kenney is quite a card. A quick trawl establishes he's a gay-baiter, gung-ho armchair warrior, with an odd habit of exceeding his immigration brief. Three years ago he attacked the pro-western Lebanese prime minister, Fuad Siniora, for being ungrateful to Canada for its support of Israeli bombardment of his country. Most curiously of all, in 2006 he addressed a rally of the so-called People's Mujahideen of Iran, a Waco-style cult, banned in the European Union as a terrorist organisation. On one level being banned by such a man is like being told to sit up straight by the hunchback of Notre Dame or being lectured on due diligence by Conrad Black."
The war of words can only get more florid and entertaining to lovers of prose!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:57 AM
4
comments
Friday, March 20, 2009
People who don't like Arabs should not apply
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
3:03 PM
3
comments
Who has this guy POd
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
10:30 AM
1 comments
Special interests always seem to prevail
In every large scale project something slips in that may not be part of the mandate of the project. In the last 'big dig' - the Library, which coincidentally was handed off the GillBrocanier to stickhandle through the process (even when he decided not to run in the next election he kept the job as chair of the building committee) there is a question of vested interests being slipped a quick one. The original concept of the Library build (also called the Cultural Centre) it was thought the Library, Art Gallery and Archives as well as other unnamed cultural entities could have a home on a controversial site (where it is now but the Town had to move a Tee-Ball pitch much to the chagrin of parents and the Legion). In the end, because of cost and design restrictions (As usual the most innovative designs were left on the cutting room floor) the Art Gallery was excluded. The building went ahead as a Library, and the Historical Society, with its subsidy, was moved into rooms at the Library.
This time the CCC has moved forward without an aquatic centre, despite the fact that 54% of those surveyed use aquatic facilities and the only one in Cobourg is maxed out and the other one is in Port Hope, but the Lawn Bowling Club is included - why? Does the Town want the existing land for more grass cutting opportunities? Does the LBC want to move? All questions to be answered as the steamroller moves inexorably forward to its conclusion - hurry up the design to make it shovel ready for the stimulus funds and get on with it in time for the coronation of Mayor Brocanier in 2010. All we have to do is finance another $10 million on the local taxes (1/3 of the total)
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:41 AM
18
comments
More on Kraft
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:35 AM
0
comments
Thursday, March 19, 2009
The Readers are always right
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:52 AM
3
comments
A rumour confirmed
PS I stand to be corrected if this rumour doesn't pan out.
Love those conservative editorials. I read a lot of online stuff and it runs the gamut. Here is an editorial from the las Vegas Review and Journal. It details some background to the AIG bonus outrage. BTW I feel that the rage is all phony designed to make lawmakers look good in a very embarrassing situation.
Who said journalism is dead, we still have backgrounders amongst us. How about this one describing just who got what in the AIG mess.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
6:34 AM
0
comments
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
He's back in the public eye
In another vein here is a interesting piece written by Jo Cruddas MP for Dagenham entitled new socialism it is a new take on an old problem - dogma.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:13 AM
0
comments
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Remember when I asked who GritGirl was?
I just wonder who is paying for these things.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
3:38 PM
3
comments
How about this a Minister of Science that will not acknowledge science
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
12:31 PM
4
comments
Speculation proves to be true
If all we are going to get out of the MILLIONS of dollars spent on this thing is more hockey facilities we have failed the general population of the Town and caved to the hockey rink rats and moms who hang out at the rink. Is hockey a rising demographic, are the facilities we have overloaded, could that overload be accomodated by one more pad instead of three? We will never know as this report will not change much in the travels through bureaucracy. So we started off with a simple request for more floor space by Seniors and ended up with an Arena fit for a Junior A team - some metamorphis!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
11:58 AM
0
comments
Is this the future of newspapers?
Will it work and is this webpage any different from any other newspaper webpage, and will it retain or repel readers? These questions are up for answering, but what we do know is that ad revenue is down and the operating costs of papers are the same, a lttle lower now that newsprint prices have tumbled, so deficits loom.
Joel Connelly write an op-ed piece extolling the virtue of the new online venture (he would,and as a survivor of the move he'd better make it work to save his job) here . However all of these optimists forget one thing - advertising revenue. You still need lots of it and it's hard to fit it into an online design without becoming overpowering.
I bet the Sun-Media gurus are watching this move very carefully, why else would the new consolidated Northumberland paper have .com in its title. Perhaps the most telling argument against local success in the online edition of both local papers is that the "interactive part" - blogs and comments sections are not well used. Can't say I blame the journos who have been asked to write blogs, what is there to say after you have banged out the maximum number of words for a pay cheque? And checking the names of the commenters there a few who I recognise as being multiple posters - they will comment on all and sundry no matter where the operation is.
Drudge has posted this link wherein former staffers of the Rocky Mountain News, the latest large market newspaper to shut down leaving inhabitants of a large urban area without newspaper coverage, have announced their answer to the problem. They will offer free content but charge a subscription for commentary and special content.
For another in depth look at the problem read this only on the web would you get this much distribution of such a long article (for instance in the NT.com columnists have been told to reduce their contributions from 750 words to 400. An edict like that would never happen online.
Finally back to the top here is a video from Seattle. It may take time to load, it's a busy day in Seattle today!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
6:33 AM
3
comments
Monday, March 16, 2009
A nice tidy job!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
1:10 PM
6
comments
Into the Breach
This is the ad that pushes the biggest load of BS that I have seen for many days. Not that Earth Day isn't important for outlining the need to conserve the Earth's resources. Where the BS comes in is the great PR campaign by local municipalities to push the idea that we should all switch our lights off to bring attention to the matter. Talk about "bread and circuses" this push by our local leaders is an exercise in hypocricy and designed to make them look good whilst doing not much.What these guys should be doing is to not put up hydro rates to maintain their revenue in the declining consumptive environment. What they should be doing is to establish teams of reno-conservation tradesmen and then back up those teams with grants to fix up our houses. We have been bombarded with exhortations for years now from all kinds of agencies to reduce our consumption and fix up our old and leaky houses, yet people still ignore those pleadings - Why?
Probably because they don't have the money to take advantage of the offers to renovate. They are reeling under the increases that utilities have demanded. If governments want us to reduce, let them help pay for it. Slick PR campaigns are just that - spin to make politicians feel good. If they want to good things mandate energy audits, enter every house and take stock. Make the bad homeowners fix up their houses and have the utilities pay for it. Local utilities should not be penalised by the market place for declining revenues brought on by reduced consumption. The Province saves money by not having to expand the hydro production and transmission systems, they should compensate local utilities from those savings.
How about working on the real problems instead of engaging in silly games that only illustrate the stupid competition between local municipalities!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
8:01 AM
3
comments
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Just a quick Sunday post
Dear Editor,
Until now, the recent "censure" fiasco at Cobourg Council could have been cast as a minor blemish but that is no longer accurate. It has quickly become something more comparable to an infected pimple, or worse, an abscess, in a sensitive nether-region.
While the debate circles around words implied yet unspoken, questions characterized as accusations, anonymities and revelations, it has yet to be dealt with in an honest and forthright manner, in order to set the records straight and provide, to the public, a factual explanation of the issue. That one issue, as it was, has now erupted into several more. It reminds me of the theorem 'lies beget lies'.
As everyone who has been in attendance is aware, the issue stems from one councillor asking a straight forward and perfectly legitimate question (or two). Instead of a simple answer, the response was framed as an accusation of impropriety and interestingly remains unanswered. Subsequently, compromise turns into betrayal as names are made public by a third but significant party (mayor). Immediately, the original question is yet again characterized by the deputy-mayor, as an outright accusation aimed at those now publicly named, and is further vilified as an attack on staff who have no means of self-defense in the public forum, where they were surprisingly thrust by the third-party's (mayor) highly improper revelation just moments before.
While council accepts without question, such an improper and treacherous betrayal of a confidence in open council and then votes to censure a perfectly legitimate question of process by a councillor, is incredibly valuable material for a study in municipal practices that are close enough to being corrupt that light would not pass through that gap. Such conduct is not often found in isolation, but as an escalation and further deterioration of practices already exhibiting dubious tendencies. Why should this be any different. This is where scandals find their genesis.
To complicate the matter even further, the records show the vote to censure resulted in a 5 - 2 count in favour. However, since then, a purported 'correction' has apparently been noted by the flip-flop councillor to amend the vote to 6 - 1. Rules of order are clear on what must be done to change the record of a vote, and that has not yet been done here. More shenanigans! - just when we thought it was as bad as it could get. Can the 'C' word be far behind?
As we can all see, 'perplexing' is heavily outvoted by 'deplorable' as an appropriate word to describe what has been going on and shows no sign of abating in this council's term. As more such instances occur, as they are likely to, the decline of confidence in this council will gather momentum and the securely entrenched 'old guard' has no one to blame but itself.
Just as the blemish becomes a pimple, the festering underneath creates a full-blown boil, and the only remedy for healing to begin is a lancing to exorcise the underlying infection that characterizes the antagonism, revilement, viciousness, ostracism, distrust, and cronyism that appears to be emerging from this collective we acknowledge as our council. The question is - how?
M. Schumann
Cobourg
905-372-8906
Mar. 13, 2009
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
3:24 PM
5
comments
So after much money this is what we get
This is the portion of tomorrow's agenda for the CoW to discuss. It is a recommendation from the highly paid consultants, that studied the need for a Recreation/Community Centre. Look carefully and you will see that a key component of any Community Centre - a swimming pool is missing. So the Hockey guys get THREE pads and the swimmers still have to pay above market prices in a small pool at the NON-profit YMCA, of which we pay to uphold.Silly me I thought the idea of such a grandiose scheme was to consolidate recreational needs and that includes cutting off the annual subsidy to the YMCA because we will need every penny for this. But if the nabobs and manipulators leave out a swimming pool then the Y can get the subsidy and the taxpayer still gets the shaft.
BTW the site for this grandiose structure has yet to be announced it was buried in the report that was not posted on the internet. There are seven sites and one involves using existing soccer fields, but the CSC has been promised replacement fields (further adding to the end cost!)
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
9:29 AM
3
comments
Friday, March 13, 2009
This vote thing has a life of its own
Just in: a link to another posting about Bob Spooner's changed vote here
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
4:51 PM
0
comments
Who is gritgirl?
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
4:25 PM
1 comments
Was it legal to change the Vote?

Page 345 sect.44
So there you have it foks the plot thickens with Councillor Spooner's vote. If the Official Recorder, the Manager of Legislative Services records the vote as 5-2 and the Chair of the meeting announces the result as 5-2 officially it is is 5-2. It will be interesting to see if the minutes are amended for the next Council meeting in the adoption of those minutes. If they have been changed it will be disputable and subject to discussion.
In another vein a comment has been posted on a previous post but must be repeated here for wider education of the readers:
I am the original "anonymous" about the Spooner vote-change trick. For the record, I am NOT any of the "anonymous" since then until now --though those anonymouses had interesting comments. Every person I spoke to who was at the meeting all agree Bob Spooner cast a "Nay" vote. Every person I spoke to who watched the meeting on TVCogeco agree Bob Spooner cast a "Nay" vote. People at the meeting and watching on TV all agree that the Town Clerk read it back that way and Councillor Spooner did not correct her. The vote was announced as 5 - 2.
The fact that the Town Clerk acknowledges a change happened THE NEXT MORNING clearly confirms that Spooner voted "nay" at the meeting. He was not correcting an error. He was changing his vote after the fact.
What is the legality, in a Recorded Vote, to cast the vote one way at the meeting and then change it the following morning? What does the Municipal Act say about this?
As is his habit, the morning of Tuesday March 10, Councillor Spooner was out and about in different places downtown. He told anyone who asked that he had voted "Nay" and also said he went into the in-camera meeting that came right after the meeting with the censure vote to tell all who voted "Yay" that he did not agree what they did. Apparently he underwent an adjustment to his p.o.v. soon after that, contacted Lorraine Brace and changed his vote. Make no mistake. He changed his vote. He did not just correct an error in the way everyone else in the world heard him.
Who gave him a viewpoint adjustment? How can this be "not important"? Councillors know a recorded vote is a significant event. How can such a significant formal procedure be revised 16 hours after the fact? Ben, what does the Municipal Act or Robert's Rules say about changing a vote after the vote is taken and announced, after the meeting ends, after 16 hours elapses? To know what he did, we don't need Spooner to tell us what he did, we saw it for ourselves. We need him or someone to tell us why he did it. We need Mayor Delanty or someone to tell us why he was allowed to do it.
If Bob Spooner thought this was going to go away because he says so he is wrong a lot of people are now really talking about this situation. It doesn't look good!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
12:29 PM
3
comments
The Mystery Sale
So you ask yourself what was the sale item, the piece worth lining up for and if bought will save $50? Looking in all the usual bargains bins I flailed around until the obvious hit me - a skid of B&D Toasters was standing where the knocked down toilet paper usually stood. These black, trimmed with chrome double bagel toasters were it! Remembering the words of the love of my life, "Have you got $20.00 if you find out what it is, it has to be worth $20 and useful!" So wondering if this item fell into that category I wandered off home knowing that Dave wouldn't be moving two skids of these things before we got back. Will we buy one? Maybe. The $9.00 Wallymart one we use is due for replacement but I don't know if we can go upscale just yet!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
8:55 AM
2
comments
First post of the day
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:46 AM
3
comments
Thursday, March 12, 2009
A very local comment with national perspective.
But the most interesting part of the email was the link to his web TV show The Real-Ality-Show a professional commentary purportedly about real Estate, but he does wander look at it!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
2:04 PM
0
comments
A unanimous vote?
But the BurdReport has obtained an email from M Mutton between her and the Manager of Legislative Services (the tallyman for the votes) this email states the reason for changing the vote count from 5-2 to 6-1:
But a person that I spoke to this morning told me that BS had told him/her on Monday evening, after the meeting, that he had indeed voted NO. So what gives?
Only the shadow knows!! Until we all view the tape.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
1:23 PM
15
comments
Chrysler threatens to take its ball away from the playground
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
9:32 AM
7
comments
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Time for one post
What is the EFCA? It is a bill that proposes change to the Union Organising rules in the States. At the moment only 13% of workers are unionised. Critics say that is because rules make it very hard for a worker to get a union. The biggest complaint is that it takes too long for supervised votes to take place. During that time workers will be coerced, intimidated and in some cases threatened if they maintain their membership and don't vote the union out.
For a good description of the problem read this. If you live anywhere the US airwaves exist be prepared for some rabid advertisements. I bet both the Libs and Cons are watching very carefully.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:11 AM
1 comments
A busy day for me but a guest link instead
For the second day in a row I am pleased to link to Wally K's site to push traffic (isn't that what the internet is all about - sharing the airwaves) to display his latest column. Well illustrated he outlines his opinion in prose that the MSM will not publish - hurray for brave cyberspace.Click here to read the full piece
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
6:48 AM
6
comments
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
An invitation from Wally K
This emailing marks a new milestone. The BCC list now contains over 100 subscribers. My mail distribution program requires me to package the list in two blocs. Thank you for forwarding my email to other interested parties, who are welcome to become part of the list.
Today's emailing is an invitation to a blog entry in COBOURG OF ALL THINGS. Just click here. It consists of a few short videos of poetry readings -- I especially want to draw your attention to one woman poet, Vanessa Hidary. I've performed at several venues in Canada, mostly Toronto, and they are all too often bloated with banality and piety. My good friend, Robert Priest, gives great performance. But Vanessa Hidary is head and bare shoulders a babe with blast. Click on the videos, and see that poetry is not an arcane art form consisting of pious tut-tuts drinking tea with white gloves & raised pinkies.
For a bit of visual poetry, click here to see the latest news on the development of a new drug called WRITE AWAY, a decongestant to break writer's blockade. Below it is the first advertisement, and below that is the transportation system and highway system. Stay tuned for further developments from the Imagine Nation of the Peoples Republic of Poetry.
Enjoy.
All good things
Wally Keeler
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
12:56 PM
0
comments
Another Council on the lighter side!
A fart interrupts the show. This reminds me of the occasions when a former councillor and later to be Deputy Reeve couldn't stop giggling whenever the phrase "cause to be erected," or the single word "erection(s)" was read into bylaws.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
12:20 PM
0
comments
And I thought this was going to a boring week
This sentence came from an article in the new CDS, story here. What it really means is that the dead white men on Council - all the other councillors - have found a way to slap down the uppity woman. These guys have never forgotten the rebuke that was given to them, a reduced numbers of votes than the election before, and have never forgotten that a woman beginner got more votes than them. Admittedly Miriam Mutton may have been out on a limb when she accused Dean McCaughey of having undeclared conflicts of interests when dealing with items in the past. But she should have been able to back up what she said, if as she states that the suspected people on the committee who may have had connections to AECOM but naming them is a matter of privacy, then her stand is defensible.
It is not hard to imagine that when Dean McCaughey sat down last week after a public rebuke from Miriam Mutton, that he realised revenge is best served cold. So he sandbagged her at Council in public. Obviously every other councillor was in on it because none of them came to her defense about the timing of the motion. At least it should have been a "notice of motion" to be voted on next week.
More to come tomorrow when the new CDS publishes her side. This event is going to be dragged out - mainly to sell newspapers.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
11:15 AM
1 comments
Monday, March 9, 2009
Video in the page - it works!
This is a test of embedding video
Hey it worked enjoy
ben
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:18 PM
1 comments
Not quite "I told you so"
Another two needless deaths out west. Two skiers, who ignored both signs and yellow tape have killed themselves and injured a couple of others, pity! But how do we as a society approach the problem of public recklessness? Not very well apparently because it is still a problem. We know better in Cobourg though, we have stamped out that kind of foolishness. We have banned ice fishing in the harbour.
GM and the CAW have come to an agreement about what the workers will have to take out of their CBA. Pensions raises frozen, extra days off lost, and a cost of living increase. killed Not much impact on the pockets of the workers but a huge concession to the Company. Now let's stop the bleating about labour costs being too high.
An interesting article here about solar power operations in the Nevada desert. But with the news that a Company is coming to the east of town to setup a solar farm one should read it. The really fascinating point is tucked away in the middle where it is explained in a large solar-voltaic plant (I believe that that is what is proposed for here) there is only ONE fulltime employee hired to operate the plant.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
8:12 AM
2
comments
Sunday, March 8, 2009
A new leader same old problem
This picture tells all. There is not a party establishment person in it. None of the Lewis clan, none of the Energy Probe sect just a couple of working class males and a person with community roots in the middle. Whether the party caucus accepts this win, but obviously the party has, fully is yet to be seen but with a brand new, uppity (only been in the Leg five years) woman leader we will have to wait and see. The last woman leader - Lynn Mcleod certainly had to prove more than her chops in the first couple of years. Let's see how Andrea can cope with the traditional settling in period.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
6:35 PM
1 comments
Do this but only if you have 30 mins to spare
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
6:26 PM
1 comments
The political stars realign in Ontario
With Andrea Horvath (I am proud to say that for the first time in years I have actually backed a winner - much to my partner's chagrin) the new NDP leader look for much social policy based in the class struggle. That's where the battles are going to be in this coming depression. Just how will the province deal with the EI victims as they drop off the rolls and have to collapse all their assets before being allowed one penny of Provincial welfare money. Working class folk will be suffering more than then shrinking middle class and their knowledge based jobs. One can only sustain a service industry for so long and DM will bearing the brunt of the problem.
So look for the change in attitude that AH will bring to the house and I look forward to real working class issues being the centre of attention instead of airy-fairy environmentalist based ones. "It's the economy stupid!"
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
8:39 AM
1 comments
Saturday, March 7, 2009
25 years later - have we learned anything?
For an analytical opinion about the Miners' Strike read this, it is the editorial in today's "Guardian" and it declares that no-one won the dispute.
Thatcher was successful and the Miners' lost. Britain became the hotbed of new technology and high finance. The Country's manufacturing base was decimated and "New Industry" emerged. Society became more reliant on "lifestyle" and debt. This led to the immolation of the UK as the economy based on the same shaky finances as NA and now is playing catchup, as is the rest of the world, in trying to preserve an economy and society.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
2:25 PM
0
comments
Friday, March 6, 2009
A taxing problem
Unfortunately what he says is pure fiction designed to allow the units to proceed without much delay. Ever since these facilities have been coming to Cobourg in the late 80s all we see is another burden on the local hospital. Retirement facilities are notorious for not providing health-care, why should they after all all they do is provide small overpriced rooms and three squares a day. Sitting outside of the Health-Care system all they do is aggregate the population of seniors and overload the local hospital. There isn't a day that goes past without me seeing, at about wake-up time at the Seniors residence just up the road from me, an ambulance , with its llights flashing, indicating an emergency, on its way to the NHH. Allowing more seniors to be brought into town to fill these facilities is not good unless we know just what the impact on the NHH is going to be. We have never had a Council commission one of these studies before granting permission to have one built - that is wrong.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
9:26 AM
2
comments
Labels: local opinion, local politics
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Friday Fluff
Spring is here. Skating has officially finished on both the Assiniboine River Trail and the Rideau Canal. How long will we in Cobourg extend the skating season?
Monday evening at Cobourg Council, the agenda shows, for the second week, a closed meeting item. Titled

"a matter that relates to consideration of a request under the Freedom of Information Act" Ummm interesting, who is asking impertinent questions that must be so sensitive that it requires Council's full attention, in private, for a full two weeks? I wonder if the public will ever know. And they say that the Federal Government is the secret one!!This week in Colborne, Council discussed the budget. In an interesting juxtposition they decided to give the Campbellford Memorial Hospital $10,000 a year for its CT Scanner fundraising. As you should know the King of Campbellford has made it his mission to install a CT scanner in the CMH. He approached the County for funding and was rebuffed, although the economic arguement made a lot of sense the fear that the County would end up funding Health Care overrode that argument. But in giving the money to CMH the Colborne Council then cut its conditional funding of the transit van. This van would transport the people who cannot either drive themselves or don't have a car around the County, mainly to Cobourg. As expected this Council has listened to their voters; the middle class sick people will get to travel to Campbellford for their CT scans, a greater convenience than having to come to Cobourg, they will probably save 10 minutes in the drive and not have to wait so long at the hospital, and the poor and elderly get the shaft. I suppose it serves them right, they don't usually vote so why should the Council be on their side!
A bit of a surprise this morning. Reading in the MSM (G&M story here) John Tory was defeated in his attempt to get back into the Ontario Legislature. The Blue Rinse crowd and the Reformers will now have something to crow about tomorrow when the Puffster comes to lunch. "The start of a journey begins with the first step" - that will be the cliche on the minds of the ReformaCons as they start to plot the demise of Dalton.
The story about the guy who pepper-sprayed by American Border Guards, is still running in the G&M, I guess some editor has a burr under his saddle about the way things went down. The Story is here but basically when the BGs asked him to turn off his car's engine he asked them to say please. “I just said please,” Mr. Fortunato explained Thursday. “He said 'get out of the car or I spray you' and ... I thought he was just trying to scare me off or something and I was pepper sprayed from a foot or two away.” I bet he won't do that again!
Another brave soul has stuck his head above the trenches. Rick Salutin, of the G&M has written a piece about "Jewish Apartheid Week" here and suggests that the very issue should mean the question of Jewish behaviour towards non-jews should be the issue not just yelling at the organisors and labelling them "anti-semites" because they dare to discuss the issue.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
5:48 PM
9
comments
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
The most moving piece I have heard in a long time
This sound clip culled from tonight's CBC As It Happens is a gem and also the most moving tribute I have heard for many a year. Mishelle Brown, wife of one of the three latest Canadians killed in Afghanistan, calls her husband a hero and her 'powerhouse' is heard here talking to the press, in St Catherines, this afternoonclick here Warning: This may not work for you I had to play with this code it is MP3.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
8:47 PM
1 comments
A small opinion about the LCBO
Boy do I feel old! Reported in the G&M here the University of Manchester, England, is going to establish an MA programme in the study of the Beatles. Perhaps the Beatles did change pop culture and had a consequent effect on the youth of the Nation but as a person who lived through it I didn't think the time would come when I would be part of a generational, almost historical, study.
Anybody want any free money? The Bank of Canada has lowered the bank Rate to .5%, as they say in Foreign Countries when the kids on the street want to sell you something, "Almost free!". I'm tempted to max out my line of credit and sink it into stocks - after all the same experts doing this are also saying the there is a great 'buying opportunity'. But wait that doesn't get the economy moving, might make me some money, but won't stimulate anything, but neither will this B 0f C move unless the Banks pass it on to those wanting operating loans but then who wants those as demand has dropped and nobody wants to buy anything so just what is one supposed to do?
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:09 AM
0
comments
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
This just in - The Puffster is coming
A little birdy tells me that he might be appearing on Cogeco, Gawd help us the reruns will go on for weeks!
PPS take a look here
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
12:13 PM
11
comments
The conflicting issues faced by investors and managers
In an interesting aside, I have just returned from the "No Frills" store. As a beneficiary of perhaps the most successful $1 sale in its history I enquired about the turkeys. Last week NF had turkeys on for a $1 a lb. People were breaking the doors down to get them. On the day the sale opened the 1200 turkeys allocated for the start of the sale had gone by noon (four hours). To date it has been estimated that over 5000 of the suckers have been snapped up by all of us survivalists and our freezers. So if the Stocks go any lower and our pension payouts fail we can all eat turkey for the weeks after!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
11:50 AM
0
comments
OK the guessing starts now
The new residential development is an interesting one for if it proposes to build hundreds of houses, using the available sewage capacity, then it will blow the Official Plan out of the water by infilling and put a lot of development plans in Area C in jeopardy. What a waste of the last few planning years and really does question the expansion ideas of the "Progressive Councils".
PS if anybody hears any rumours about the identity of the mystery buyer post it here!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
11:04 AM
0
comments
If you have time to kill - check this out!
BTW a Canadian is fourth in the running!
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:01 AM
0
comments
Monday, March 2, 2009
Is it time for another committee?
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
7:09 AM
0
comments
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Sunday Snippets
"During earlier discussions about the makeup of the committee struck to assess the bids for the engineering consultants contract, Miriam asked if there had been any disclosures, or was there a need for any disclosures, concerning potential conflict of interests on the part of any members of the committee. One would deduce from her question that she had wind of some questionable choices and at one time she questioned if there was any kind of possible connection between any member of the committee and any one in the employment, at some point, of one of the firms bidding for the contract. Both McCaughey and Brocanier took exception to her questions and spoke at council about it, with McCaughey demanding a formal apology from her. Miriam flew off the handle and told McCaughey in no uncertain terms that he was "the last person on earth in a position to demand such an apology!" to which McCaughey put his tail between his legs and sat down. Before that skirmish, Brocanier asked for an apology, Miriam did not respond directly, the mayor asked Miriam if she was prepared to offer an apology and she emphatically stated that she was not prepared to do so. In that moment of nothingness, McCaughey made his embarrassing stab at it."
Will the world know what is going on? Perhaps not but details will filter out via the "dead white man's club" in time. As conspiracy theorists know nothing stays silent long, especially in the case of older conspiracies, as people die off they want to confess. Not saying that Bob Spooner is dying off but he will probably let his colleagues at the Dutch oven in on the secret.
I was intrigued by a National Post article about Conrad Black. As we all know he is prison in Florida serving a six year sentence for bilking shareholders. In this collection of email answers to questions posed by Theresa Tedesco he describes what he is up to. What I find interesting is the connection, made by observers, that great writing often emerges from people in prison. I guess they use the time productively!. In Black's case he is an historian and therefore he can effectively write about the impact of both liars and cheats in his case and whether he will be vindicated by the facts.
I guess Bob Rae is in a state of vindication amid reports that Dalton McGuinty's response to the looming depression is to unleash cases of red ink at the problem. The interesting thing in this case is just how it is perfectly alright for Dalton to run a deficit and Bob Rae was pilloried for doing the same thing. My response to that is that DM is not out of favour with the voters. BR never had the approval of anybody other than his supporters at the start and they rapidly dwindled as he ruled by ignoring party policy. It's hard to govern with only 38% support at the best of times - just ask Harper how hard it is! So run the deficits Dalton, the province is with you!
"Just get the money out there, mistakes be damned" that's the message from the Federal Government. So what mistakes can we expect? One that is emerging very quickly is the charge leveled by opposition MPs is that Conservative MPs are getting a leg up in the infrastructure applications. Let's hope that that's not true. "Follow the Money" Jerry McGuire used to say and in this case I hope that the MSM will do just that and expose any cases of "porkbarreling" in Con Ridings.
Posted by
Ben Burd
at
10:40 AM
4
comments


