Last night's public meeting, to discuss the proposed Community Centre didn't have much of a spark. A droning performance by a consultant, a Chair who wanted to keep the meeting moving, a couple of people who asked good questions and a very good performance by Stephen Peacock, Director of Works who demonstrated why he is on the "sunshine list".
After starting late the consultant Mary, "don't forget the Catherine", Mehak ran through a PowerPoint presentation and explained the essential items like: a 2 pad arena one with 2000 seats, a mezzanine running track, rooms for seniors and youth, a double gym and a lawn bowling room all inside a 116,040 square foot building at a cost of $27.4 million.
Most people were there to hear the bits about the funding costs, a slide was presented but it didn't make too much sense to most of the older audience (the younger ones didn't figure it out either). But essentially the committee will have to do more work on explaining how the $689,700 (or was it $889,700) will compare to the existing costs. Later in the evening, in answer to a question it was revealed that the existing Jack Heenan arena will stay as ice and the Memorial arena will be converted to an indoor recreation facility that will recover all of its operating costs through user fees. However as the report is now to be sent off to the staff and reappear at Council in July there should be plenty of time to sort that stuff out.
One of the big concerns raised and was quickly put down was the early perception that there would be allocated space for specific groups inside the facility. One person, John Gear, presumably a leader of an older peoples organisation asked, "Where is the seniors space, we need more than just a small room?" Then the Koombayahs came out. Peacock stated that everybody has to learn to share and expands on the "nature of sharing", "everybody owns this place it is not a collection of group spaces." The consultant stated, "Everybody gets something!"
Bill Henry (a lawn bowler I believe) was the first up and he dominated the question period with the volume of questions. Basically he wanted to know two things: when would the public get to hear about the funding arrangements and why was the "Y" heavily involved, "In fact if you read this report it is obvious by reading it, that the Y is an integral part of the proposal - why?. Council must know that they are separate!" he asked.
The question of the lack of a swimming pool came up and the answer was "Nobody indicated a need and the "Y" didn't say that their pool was up to capacity." - oops did the swimmers not understand the process, I guess not. Someone following on also pointed out that that some people couldn't afford to go to the "Y" and stated that a municipal pool should be cheaper and therefore should be included.
Finally the last set of questions, asked by Bill Henry, "How accurate are the population projections that this proposal is based on?" That question finally stirred the lumbering elephantine personage of Councillor MacDonald who blustered his way into a rambling explanation of the housing developments (not that many) on the books and in that area of Town. concluding with, "Even the province's consultant admits that the low numbers in the County Growth Study will go up, so we will have a population to support it in 2031"
All in all an exercise in democracy for the one hundred or so people who bothered to come out, stay tuned for the next step - a Council meeting July 20th. A bit disappointing for those who wanted to hear about the funding arrangements though!
A bit of a tempest has turned up inside these pages as a result of the report of the recent raise given to the firefighters. Essentially a retired firefighter, who had the nerve to sign off with his name, made a comment about the raise being excessive and some other opinions about the workings of the present department. Predictably that elicited a response from one of the serving firefighters who questioned both the accuracy of the report of the raise and the RF's opinions. All I can say is the original report about the raise was just that, no opinion or comments about the merits of the deal or criticism of the Fire Department and those who work there, and the accuracy stands.