Read more: http://www.blogdoctor.me/2008/02/fix-page-elements-layout-editor-no.html#ixzz0MHHE3S64

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Just getting ready for Monday

According to the procedure on the Town's website and data gleaned from the MSM Monday evening will be busy for those who wish to have their say in the process. The Concert Hall is being rolled out for the occasion and everybody will dressed to the nines to hear five companies talk for ten minutes about their respecrtive submissions.
The general public - us - will have an opportunity to be heard by submitting questions to the Mayor and he will ask those questions directly.
  • Problem #1 - the downloadable comment form instructs that submissions will be accepted by Thursday Dec, 3rd, a little late for a Monday question?
  • Problem #2 - What if the Mayor doesn't like your question, will he ask it?

Perusing the docs this morning elicited the following information:
  • Giffels - no mention of size
  • Peak - 121,000 sf
  • Bird - 116,000 sf
  • Bondfield - 125,000 sf
  • Ball - no mention
  • All documents boast about using the latest in recycled materials, diminishing construction waste that is to be landfilled and most propose to use the same ice-making apparatus that recycles water and chemicals, but none state the overall operating costs. It's about time we looked at building specs the way we do for cars - measure the energy consumption and costs

This is important when considering the overall construction costs. So the questions I will be submitting, and let's see if the Mayor asks them are:
  • How much per square foot to construct each concept
  • What is the proposed operating cost per square foot

Now for the floor plans, grabbed from each submission. I make no apologies for the quality. I really do think that as we get into the 21st Century electronic versions, other than pdf files should be mandated. For example an image that can be magnified is essential. Clicking on the image will get you a somewhat larger pic.


Ball Construction

















Bird Construction



















Bondfield Construction






















Giffels Construction

























Peak Construction























A description of the concepts can be found here

Friday, November 27, 2009

Following up

The CCC contestants will be making their cases on Monday in the public forum however as most of the entries will cost the same amount,, not much less than the maximum budget, cost will not be a factor. So what will? the largest amount of glass, who has the shiniest CVs or any other Wow factor? In a recent post one really intelligent suggestion has been made - who has the best suggestion to lower operating costs? Who is using the most environmetally friiendly systems? In other words which of these building will be cheapest to maintain. As operating costs will the key to public support in the years after contruction surely a really good assessment of operating costs per building should be the main consideration, for as the commenter said almost all the buildings look alike and if they cost the same, within a few thousands, there has to be one distinguishing factor. Let them all be measured on operating costs.

Some images of the future

One of the more interesting parts of public life is being able to see what few people care about. The imagination of the future. For every development plan presented there is a watercolour painting of the concept (you could fill a book with the developers prints of the harbour plans presented during the 80s). Here are the concepts of the Community Centre as presented to the public yesterday.

Peak Construction


















Giffels Construction














Bird Construction













Bondfield Construction








Ball Construction









Now you have until December 3rd to make up your mind and then mail or deliver your preferences to the Mayor. He will then tally them up and tell Council on Monday what the public choice was. Click here, print off the form, fill it out and your done.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Sometimes we win one

Most elections progressives and alternate thinkers do not get their candidates elected. However those of us who do not support the status quo have a little bit to cheer about today and the neo-cons will be driven to distraction by the news that another bogeyman is in Town. The polarising figure in the picture is Sid Ryan, formerly President of the CUPE division of Ontario, now the President of the Ontario Federation of Labour. This fiery charismatic person, one who compels almost instant opinion is now in the twilight of his career as a labour leader and his final hurrah will be to steer the house of labour through turbulent waters. I wish him luck.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

A very pertinent guest post

submitted by Martin Partridge

All good things must come to an end so I so suppose the demise of First Night Cobourg was inevitable. I'd like to briefly document the history of First Night Cobourg from my perspective as former chair. Others may wish to augment the record.

Former Councillor Pam Jackson fired up the original First Night Cobourg volunteer group in about 1994. The committee created a small-scale version of Toronto's successful New Year's Eve non-alcoholic street festival, which in turn was modeled on major events in Boston and elsewhere. Local entertainers, performance groups and face painters warmed up clusters of Cobourg families, both inside and outside Cobourg's historic downtown municipal properties (notably the Firehall, Market Building, and of course Victoria Hall). There were horse-drawn hay wagons to ride on, and barrels of burning firewood to keep volunteers warm. At midnight, mainly for the benefit of the remaining hardy volunteers, there was a small fireworks display right in front of Victoria Hall. The cost for the whole evening was $5, free for children.

After three modestly profitable years, the committee responsible for the event ratcheted up the entertainment, running carefully timed hour-long music events for three hours in six locations, for a total of 18 highly professional and diverse shows ending at 9:30 p.m. A people's parade was then led by the Town Crier down to the waterfront for a much larger fireworks display, which had been moved to earlier in the evening for the benefit of the children. The evening ended with a two-hour major show in the Concert Hall. The price was kept at $5 with children free, thanks to ever growing sponsor donations.

This new-style First Night Cobourg, with its tightly formatted entertainment program, culminated in a major millennium event on December 31, 1999. More than 7,000 people thronged the downtown buildings and the waterfront for double-decker bus rides, very high quality children's shows, notable entertainment from across Canada, and a huge fireworks display. There was a cultural exchange, which resulted in a musical group called Middle Tickle travelling from Fogo Island in Newfoundland to perform in Victoria Hall with Aengus Finnan simultaneously travelling to Fogo Island to entertain the residents there. A rudimentary internet camera was set up at each end to allow each side to see what the other was doing. Fireworks were set off here at precisely 10:30 p.m. to coincide with the first Canadian arrival of the year 2000 in Newfoundland. A conference call, initiated in Cobourg, was held among federal, provincial, municipal and European politicians and personages to exchange millennium greetings. Hovering over all this were the Y2K fears, which seem quaint now but were genuine at the time and resulted in a broad scramble for backup generators and had all emergency services on standby.

Cobourg citizens, in part through its automotive dealers, industrial plants, lawyers and other groups, came up with about $30,000 in donations and badge purchases to pay for the big Y2K entertainment, and Council contributed $15,000 for the grand fireworks. The event was such a great success, with tourists writing in to say keep up the good work, that the committee asked Council to endorse a similar approach the following year. Instead, major funding was denied and the event ended up being cancelled altogether. December 31, 2000 was the only "dark" New Year's Eve in downtown Cobourg in the last 15 years.

The event was resurrected a year later thanks to new committee chair Gerry Drage and many long-time devoted committee members including Bert McMillan, Sharron McMann and (eventual chair) Brian Edmiston. The event has been held successfully throughout this decade.

I thought the one saving grace of installing the controversial concrete frink in place of parkland in downtown Cobourg was that it would be used to inject new purpose and vigour into First Night Cobourg. Indeed, the new frink was well used at last year's First Night event.

I'm sad but not surprised that this Council could not see the logic, after blowing off about $1.5 million to install a concrete skating pad in the centre of First Night Cobourg operations, to invest a little more to shore up the one established and well loved winter event that could put it to good use. After all, increasing tourism during the winter months was cited by Council as a prime rationale for the frink decision. Perhaps a refreshed and revived future Council will see things differently.


Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Finally a politician who speaks his mind

Just when pols of all stripes are in the middle of being muzzled by apparatchiks in leaders' office we find one who is willing to let it all out. Unfortunately he will not be applauded for his efforts A story in the Nova Scotia News - TheChronicleHerald.ca details it all Gerald Keddy, the Conservative MP for South Shore-St. Margarets let out this quote when talking about the use of immigrant workers in Nova Scotia working on Christmas tree farms, "Nova Scotians won’t do it — all those no-good bastards sitting on the sidewalk in Halifax that can’t get work," Mr. Keddy said Monday.The Mayor of Halifax is outraged and newspaper editorials are excoriating the MP for his opinion, bet it goes down well at "Timmies"!

Monday, November 23, 2009

Why this woman is important

This is the face that may change Canadian politics. Who is she and what has she done? Why it's Janine Krieber. Who is she you ask, knowing that only political junkies will know this one? But if it was revealed that she is Stephane Dion's wife most people will roll their eyes and connect her to a loser. Don't do that she has just provoked what could be a game-changing moment in the world of mushy politics.
Mushy politics is the art of trying to be elected by promising not to be the other guy. In the case of present leaders the Libs and Cons have an identity crisis and mushy politics have clashed with identity politics and the result is confusion for the voters and an election would be based on gut reactions to either leader.
When a prominent person starts to speak out one of two things will happen. One is that whatever was said would be treated like the Sermon on the Mount or more dangerously the context of the statement would be written off as the dangerous ramblings of the speaker, who is already a figure of derision.
In the case of Mrs Dion posting a savage critique of the Liberal Party and Michael Ignattief on her facebook page (incidentally doesn't this magnify the power of alternate media?) look at it here, the wrath of the pundits and pols is to shoot the messenger rather looking at the substance of the message.
The substance of the message is really profound: Here we have an intellectual person detailing how in her opinion the Libs have lost it and offers an opinion on the future of the Party if it doesn't change direction. Indicating the example of the UK Libs who have failed to be a force Since Lloyd George and now has morphed into the real mushy middle of the Social Dems. And she suggests, oh the heresy of it, that another party may be willing to accept the progressive voters in the Liberal Party because the Libs have ignored their opinions. Shades of a debate we had here last week in the comment threads of the BurdReport.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

A fine day for a fine parade






Port Hope Pipe Band, dressed for Christmas












Traditional Brass Band

















Cutest pair in the parade














"They never told me funny hats were in the job description!"











A long way from the North Pole





















And here he is the Old Man himself

Housekeeping for the Community Centre Contract

Monday evening will take us further into the CCC project. The Project Managers - mhpm - have submitted a couple of subcontracts for Council's approval. One for a Compliance Consultant, that's the guy that will check to see if what we get ,is what has been promised. Whether they check just the specifications or the costs is not known but it is comforting to know that somebody is going to watchdog the project. But was the choosing of the consultant transparent as the PMs made up a list of firms that should be invited to tender. When only two of the seven invitees responded the PMs reviewed the applications and then made a recommendation. So the guy doing the job gets to pick the guy who is going to watchdog? This is standard management practise after all why would the PM want a company that would be hard to get along with?
The other point that jumped out at me is seen in this extract from the letter to Council from the PM.
If you click on the pic you will read that because the budget for all four phases of the compliance contract was $125K and the successful invitee's bid was $255 - $140K overbudget, the PM recommended that the invitee only be awarded the first two phases for a cost of $107K. So are we overbudget already, and this is only the first subcontract from mhpm?

A second contract is going to be awarded, one for an Accessibility Consultant, presumably to check out the drawings for accessability problems, the BurdReport has been told that this building will be the most accessible building to be built in Ontario when it is finished. According to the report submitted to the Council the Chair of the Accessibility Committee did an exhaustive search and then discovered that very few firms or individuals are capable of all aspects of peer review. Obviously this time consuming process (tracking down a qualified firm and then negotiating a contract) is a difficult job for a committee so it has punted it off to the PM. He has the authority to conduct a search, and sole source the contract. What is not made clear in the paperwork is the fact that although the contract may be sole-sourced from a list of names given to the PM by the committee, the awarding of the contract is still subject to scrutiny by the committee. A good process adopted by the Committee.

Sunday #1 - A fog of confusion

This week's CRTC hearings cap a month's cacophony of attack ads from both sides in the dispute. Cable Companies snatch TV transmissions from the airwaves, package them into incongruous bundles and then peddle them to TV owners who don't have TV towers, or want more TV channels than offered on the airwaves. The TV companies spend great gobs of money on US shows that are supposed to attract plenty of eyeballs, then those eyeball stats are sold to ad buyers who think that huge numbers of people are watching their ads. That was the model up to a few years ago.
Then came the diversity of interests produced by alternate media, and timeshifting with PVRs. Ad revenue started to slip for the TV companies. The TV companies also made boneheaded decisions to get bigger, financed the aquisitions with debt that the operating costs funded by ad revenue had to support and suddenly the once wealthy TV companies were struggling to get by on a couple of hundred million a year. The Cable companies, also ravaged by aquisition fever now found it uneconomical to support both their capital costs of getting bigger by building transmissioin networks and cannibalising themselves and also found themselves in a fight with the TV companies who want to charge the Cable companies for the transmissions that are free.
As a consumer how can you not be confused by the conflicting claims. There is a whole bunch of bad in this issue. Cable companies assembling their retransmissions into "bundles". These bundles are a mess and don't have an affinity of interest and also force the consumer to purchase many bundles just to get the few channels they want, thereby increasing consumer costs. TV companies claiming that unless they get more money local TV stations will be shut down. Oh what a mess.
Then in the middle of this is the regulator - the CRTC. This august body is at its wits end and the Chair has expressed his frustration with both sides often. He doesn't want to make the hard decision of making the consumer pay just because the two sides are intransigent.They have a mandate to protect the consumer and make sure that the players get along. So what's the answer? If I was the regulator this is what I would do.
  • Establish that both parties are at fault, because of bad business decisions and tell them their is still enough money in their bottom lines to support themselves.
  • Tell the Cable companies to stop bundling and establish a price per channel and allow consumers to purchase individual channels.
  • Acknowledge that there is an obligation for the Cable companies to pay for their channels from the sky and not to pass the fees they will have to pay to consumers.
  • Mandate a higher level of Canadian content in the TV companies programming so that they would have less airtime to fill with their expensive American shows.
Now this list comes from a not so ignorant consumer, but one who is still confused by the issue, so please comment on this and perhaps we can prepare a consumers' response to the issue.