So it's a done deal, or is it?
It is an amorphous piece of work. Council approves the idea and then shops out all the details to "the best Project Managers we can find" and then sets up committees to liaise with the PM to actually build the box with two rinks. CAO Robinson told me yesterday that the scope is in the report that outlines the project that was issued in June, so what's the problem. The Director of Works tells me that the scope is limited because the building is designed to be so flexible it can be a convention centre one day, a Seniors' centre the next and at the same time can host a basketball tournament. He didn't use those words but says, "The key to this building is its flexibility, no one group will have a piece of it, All will share it" It appears that the word "scope" has two meanings: one - Frost's (the traditional PM definition) where the costs and uses are fully outlined so that one can see future risk and potential over-run and the rest that say "These guys we hired will build it for $27 million and eat the over-run. But the danger in that is when over runs or rework or increased material costs happen the building will be redesigned to accommodate it and we won't get what we thought we would get. However as the next stage of the process is the issuing of the RFP Council will then get to see what we think we will get at the end. That's why the process drones on and on, Council can still get out of it by not issuing the RFP. But the philosophical differences in this debate can be summed by by watching a huge beast of a man - Cllr MacDonald rising to the full height of a bull elephant fulminating with condescension and disdain as he rose to rebut Frost, he was ready to speak at the start of the debate, and could hardly wait to knock Frost's arguments. Speaking with much pomposity and arrogance, as only he can, proudly declared, "As all the scope is outlined in the report I can only assume that the Steering Committee's work, on which you have a seat, will be complete by 2010, and we have have two professionals (Peacock and Robinson) who, in their considered opinion, say it can be done." So there you have it folks we don't need a Council to take ownership of the project send it off to unelected committees and let Councillor MacDonald concentrate on serious matters - points of order and other picayune points of procedure that Cllr Mutton may cause that offend his senses of parliament!
As to the problem of the Lawn Bowling Club going into the building on public money that will solved because the bowlers can't agree on moving. Especially if they have to pay full market value for the privilege.
In other Council news, revealed by the coordinators' reports, Cllr McCaughey told the world that some of our public trees are bug infested, and Cllr Mutton revealed that the Committee for Art in Public Spaces could not find any local takers to carve the tree stump in Victoria park so an invitation will be sent to esteemed out of town tree carvers to produce a work of art from a limbless stump, albeit a thirty foot high stump.




