And you wonder why people are discouraged -
But the point of this post is to show that public consultation is not wanted and in fact discouraged. For example. The final public consultation is taking place next week, but it is an Open House, not a public meeting. This is important as Open Houses, the forum where "tables" are manned by experts to answer the various anticipated questions which can be easily deflected because of the intimate form of the meeting, a far different setup to a "public meeting" where questioners actually have to pose questions at a microphone to a panel or an expert. Two things happen at public meetings: all the audience gets to hear the question posed, and this is good - questions will not be repeated and follow up questions can lead to meaningful discussions about complex issues and the presenters are identified to all.
If an interested party has a serious concern, not satisfied by the answers given at the Open House, they will be asked to put it into writing for the consultant's consideration and to form part of the public record. In the case of the OP review next week the cutoff date for all written responses is the NEXT DAY. So if an interested party has a concern, they had better be prepared to stay up all night reviewing the answers given to them at the Open House, the day before the deadline for submissions. A bad piece of timing, but will in fact discourage some comments.


