Why the Town can't be taken seriously about its budget
Two instances of folly have shown up in the last two weeks from the Mayor and Council in their attitude towards the Town's finances. The first was approving a capital budget and a tender request for the "frink" wanting it built before the end of the year, and then not approving operating funds for the said object - mind boggling! The second instance is allowing the Cobourg Yacht Club to operate on a pathetically low lease for its facilities. Occupying prime harbour lands for its clubhouse and boat storage yard, not to mention having exclusive parking rights in the only parking lot in the Marina not subject to parking fees, they only pay $2 per year, and now Council has allowed this ripoff of taxpayers for another 15 years. This cavalier attitude to the husbanding of the Town's financial resources is a betrayal of taxpayers trust. Town assets should be used by the private sector at normal commercial rates. This same Council at budget time will do what all other Councils do when looking at budget lines will bemoan the lack of financial acumen that allowed a previous council to grant the St Peter's Court low income complex a fifty year tax break and yet they allow a club that has faced charges of elitism and exclusivity for years get a sweetheart lease rate. Shame.
Count me out on this one
The mighty Mayors of the Lakeshore have engaged in a case of testoral/estrogal bragging (one of them is a woman) about whose town will use less hydro on the most useless example of municipal feelgoodism I have seen in a long while. I refer to the one hour of self inflicted darkness to demonstrate to the world that if people wanted to they can use less hydro. This exercise called by do-gooders and greenies is supposed to draw attention to the need for more conservation measures. Just like other political stunts, and the proposed Mayor's anti-poverty taskforce is one of them, this voluntary shutdown is just that, a stunt.
If the Town was serious about conservation it would instruct the company they own - Lakefront Utilities, to implement meaningful conservation measures: grants or subsidies for home renovation programmes, meaningful rate reductions for users who save energy, aggressive appliance replacement programmes etc. But they will not do that because, despite talking a big case, the Town and the Utility are scared s***less that consumption would drop. They would lose revenue and in the absence of a Provincial revenue replacement programme local rates would have to go up to cover the revenue loss.
I would suggest that if these grandstanding politicos and greenies were serious about this day let them try it on a day in the middle of the darkest winter and then see who falls for this local con game.
So who is the American now?
This week when one of the Harper clones excoriated the DIon Liberals for "an act of americanism" for pushing the RESP private members bill through the House, he obviously didn't know that his own party was guilty of an even greater example of Americanism. The term refers to the practice of member initiated bills (as opposed to government bills) or the attachment of items having nothing to do with the bill being passed. The best example of this has now come from the Cons. They have buried, way down in the budget, an item that has nothing to do with money but Tory ideology, a clause that allows the Minister of Immigration to whatever they want to do in the administration of immigration quantity and quality. What has immigration got to do with the budget, yet the Liberals are damned as "Americanised billmakers". Such chutzpah, the immigration item will go over well with the redneck community but destroy whatever efforts Jason Kenney has been doing in the ethnic communities trying to get their votes. What Tory numbskull thought that one up!
Another slant on the private lives of Public Figures
New York state's Governor has resigned for being exposed as a person who frequented prostitutes. I wonder if he not been such a hypocrite (he aggressively prosecuted call-girl rings in a previous occupation) as opposed to being just a politician with a penchant and craving for extra-marital sex, would there have been such a furor?