A panel of investigators came to Town looking for local symptoms. Health Care cuts and the impact on local communities was on the agenda: "Tell us what is going on in Northumberland!". The community responded - over 100 people came out to see what was going on and some gave their opinion, stories and pleas, in public for the record. The Panel, part of the
Ontario Health Coalition's mandate, was out to see what was really going on the delivery, and reallocation of, local health care.In a briefing note,
click here to read it, the Coalition has collected, from public sources (as the MoH has not been forthcoming with requests for information), a collection of bad news. All of the Local Heath Integrated Networks (LHINs) have been following the same formula - cut hospital resources by 1% from last year. The effect has been devastating and predictable. Communities have lost services and more damaging, the services that remain but have been shifted to the community, are not free anymore.
A lineup of local people stood and spoke about their issues: Dawn Forster spoke about being a Care-Giver, with llittle support now, let alone in the future when in-hospital rehab services will be gone. Pat Cory spoke about the impact of the cuts on him, as a volunteer still healthy but wary because he moved here to be near the new hospital.
Deb O'Connor spoke about the effect of the cuts on the poor, who have, because of inadequate income have disproportionately higher levels of bad health and therefore use the hospital more than other groups - no money - no services - no health! The president of the local Nurses Union spoke, predictably about the impact of losing 30 nursing positions, likewise the president of the local CUPE unit said that because of the balancing of the cuts the job losses will be more like 45 jobs lost.
The end result will be a 20% downsizing in hospital resources and up to 45 well paying jobs lost.
It should be noted that very few solutions were proposed but in a report today the major fundraiser for the hospital - Bill Patchett, has announced that a group of local peole will be attending the next phase of the process, the Board meeting of the LHIN where these proposals are to be ratified.
The CAO of the hospital should be able to say he done his job - balance the budget, but the flaw in this plan is that most of the cuts will not be effective until the community resources are available. As the LHIN has not been funding Long Term Beds in the community so far how will Mr Biron be able to clear out the "bedblockers"?
Besides there is a potential for terrible abuse of the community, remember when the Developmentally Challenged were moved out of D'Arcy Place, and other institutions? The community was supposed to have community resources in place before the move - that worked out well didn't it?
In an ever increasing cycle of budget cuts and the need to balance the treatment of sick people you have the fixed cost of allocated money butting up against the need to treat the sick no matter what it costs. Just how many times can the health system be examined for efficiencies and methods? But as we heard yesterday the local hospital may have heard from an internally designed panel that wasn't allowed to discuss the overall picture, i.e. cutting the administration, but Mr Biron has not, according to the two local Presidents, spoken in any way with them for their ideas. Doesn't sound very cooperative to me.