A tribute to a good one
Lou Albano, a mighty figure from some of our youth died yesterday, here is a tribute
And the crooks that couldn't get it right
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
The law of diminishing returns
RIDE CHECKS CONDUCTED:NORTHUMBERLAND -- Twelve RIDE (Reduce Impaired Driving Everywhere) checks were conducted through the weekend in Northumberland County. One test was conducted, nine Provincial Offence charges were laid and 947 vehicle checked.
This was the story this weekend, couple that with the story of an impaired driver being chased down and booked as part of normal policing in Cobourg on Saturday evening and one has to question the efficacy of RIDE programs. The number of impaired people being caught up in RIDE programs has been going down for years and yet we spend wads of cash on them. Admittedly the cash comes in the form of Provincial grants - read political slush money, but honestly is spending this cash a good return on our policing dollars?
Talking about this with the Chief of Cobourg's police service yesterday the BR was told that it is conventional policing wisdom that the police can catch all the drunks they can but until the courts start to put some of them away for a long time you will always have drunks behind the wheel. "Impaired driving charges are the most litigated of all criminal charges and if you have the money to fight a charge you can succeed in reducing it or winning in court. The seriousness of the offence is not recognised by the courts." Chief Sweet said. And I agree. Until we do what the Scandinavian countries have done - put drunk drivers in jail on the first offence, after catching them with normal police work not a stunt like RIDE, we will not get the offenders off the road. And MADD can huff and puff all it wants but random police checks will not be working either. But, then which politician wants to stand up for civil liberties in the face of MADD - even Jack Layton has caved on this one!
This was the story this weekend, couple that with the story of an impaired driver being chased down and booked as part of normal policing in Cobourg on Saturday evening and one has to question the efficacy of RIDE programs. The number of impaired people being caught up in RIDE programs has been going down for years and yet we spend wads of cash on them. Admittedly the cash comes in the form of Provincial grants - read political slush money, but honestly is spending this cash a good return on our policing dollars?
Talking about this with the Chief of Cobourg's police service yesterday the BR was told that it is conventional policing wisdom that the police can catch all the drunks they can but until the courts start to put some of them away for a long time you will always have drunks behind the wheel. "Impaired driving charges are the most litigated of all criminal charges and if you have the money to fight a charge you can succeed in reducing it or winning in court. The seriousness of the offence is not recognised by the courts." Chief Sweet said. And I agree. Until we do what the Scandinavian countries have done - put drunk drivers in jail on the first offence, after catching them with normal police work not a stunt like RIDE, we will not get the offenders off the road. And MADD can huff and puff all it wants but random police checks will not be working either. But, then which politician wants to stand up for civil liberties in the face of MADD - even Jack Layton has caved on this one!
A post from a regular
Hello Friends,
Here's a link to a provocative piece on a subject of importance to all of us. I think that it will interest you.
Let me know what you are reading these days, eh?!
Bill
Get back on topic folks
I have made an executive decision - the comments on previous posts "new comment on a guest piece" and "comment on just wondering" have been closed. A person signing in as Anonymous (who else?) has crossed the line and vented in a personal manner against another poster. If the anonymous person doesn't have the stones to sign their name and still wants to insult people go someplace else or just put the comments on a washroom wall. If the anonymous person had put a name to the comments they would have been published. You can't have it both ways - make personal attacks and then hide behind "anonymous". Not here anyway!
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Sunday #6
Had to post this one even though I'm off to drink beer.
A fantastic use of twitter by local 14193 USWA - shades of the immediacy of the Iranian protests driven by twitter. Finally a useful use for this programme!
Sunday #5
I'm off to eat turkey and drink beer! but for your entertainment here is a delightful link to holiday cheer Thanks to a friend for the post.
Sunday #4
Back to an old hobby-horse The labour force stats came out on Friday and the headline was "Unemployment goes down" This creates the impression that more people are working and we are supposed to feel good. But looking at the figures in a way that most pundits don't the BurdReport can show that not only has unemployment not gone down but we are living in the area of the province with the second most unemployed per capita - only NorthWest Ontario is worse. Cobourg is situated in the Muskoka-Kawartha Region for the statistics. Clicking on the image one can examine the stats at your leisure. For instance there are only three columns to study: "unemployment", "labour force" and "employment rate". Compared to this time last year all the 2009 figures are worse than 2008 showing a smaller workforce and participation rate. The regional employment rate also shows the biggest gap between 08 and 09 for the province. Comparing the January figures (not shown) with the September figures, and remember September is supposed to be a peak month for all employment, the unemployment number is the same 9.9%.What do these numbers prove? To me it shows that if you reduce the workforce and calculate the number of active unemployed as a percentage you can show that unemployment has gone down. But digging deeper you show that this region is in an abysmal state for the unemployed and local pols are doing diddley squat to relieve it. Infrastructure money has failed to produce one visible new job, just jobs for laid off construction workers working on scheduled municipal capital projects - jobs that would have happened anyway, and pitifully few to date, and the EI exhaustees have been abandoned. Sad!
Sunday #3
The first of many extra costs. We all knew that there would be extra costs for the Community Centre project and here is one of the first. A request from the Fundraising Committee (FRC) for $298,000. Click on the image for a full size printout.An observation, when the committees were setup and staffed with volunteers most of us thought these good volunteering folk were donating a whack of their time for the common good. This committee stacked with local fundraisers has obviously found the job to be too much for volunteers and like all good professionals have found a way to delegate the job, but it comes with a pricetag. Now we can only hope that FRC becomes a mighty fine watchdog now they have offloaded the heavy lifting?
Sunday # 2
What's going in here? On Tuesday evening, at Cobourg Council, a letter is on the agenda from the local Lions Club. There has been a dispute between Council and the Lions Club over the repair of the building the Club leases from the Town. The Club feels that because the building is owned by the Town that they, the Town should be responsible for the upkeep of the building, as opposed to routine maintenance paid for by the Club. The Town feels that because the building may be Town owned, because of the way it was funded, years ago with a Wintario grant, that the Club should pay for all.
But back to the letter. The letter plainly states that unless the Town changes its stance and pays for the roof, the Lions Club cannot afford to do so, tells the Town that it has only two options: the inability to commit to future community projects, or to remove the Club's assets and vacate the building.
So what's the Town's response to the prospect of financial ruin for one of the community pillars? To receive this letter for information purposes. In other words to file, in file 13 - the round filing cabinet, to ignore the problem, in public. I say in public because of the absence of statements of intent from the Council. All we as members of the public, but having a vested interest, can do is hope that there is something going on behind the scenes. Unfortunately this file may be in the hands of "Sluggo" - Councillor "we don't want to set a precedent here" MacDonald. So the public faced with the prospect of watching the Lions Club move out of a building because they can't afford to repair and perhaps the ending of some of its service club activities will have to depend on moves being made behind the scenes, or do we?
But back to the letter. The letter plainly states that unless the Town changes its stance and pays for the roof, the Lions Club cannot afford to do so, tells the Town that it has only two options: the inability to commit to future community projects, or to remove the Club's assets and vacate the building.
So what's the Town's response to the prospect of financial ruin for one of the community pillars? To receive this letter for information purposes. In other words to file, in file 13 - the round filing cabinet, to ignore the problem, in public. I say in public because of the absence of statements of intent from the Council. All we as members of the public, but having a vested interest, can do is hope that there is something going on behind the scenes. Unfortunately this file may be in the hands of "Sluggo" - Councillor "we don't want to set a precedent here" MacDonald. So the public faced with the prospect of watching the Lions Club move out of a building because they can't afford to repair and perhaps the ending of some of its service club activities will have to depend on moves being made behind the scenes, or do we?
Sunday # 1
Lou Rinaldi, that vertically challenged man who represents us with platitudes and apparent indifference to anything that cannot be put in a press release, is defending the provincial move to the HST. After reading much about it I now know what infuriates me about this cash grab. Never mind the fact that it will bite into my disposable income by taxing products which are currently not taxed, but the consumer will pay. This is not a progressive or fair tax. Businesses will be able to claim "input credits" and get rebates. Why should this be. It will mean a huge shift in taxpaying from business to consumer. Totally unfair.
"Business will thrive" says Lou, but at whose expense? If there's anything we know about consumer economics is that there is only so much money to go around and all these moves in taxation shifts do is to move the burden. If the HST and the elimination of Provincial sales tax is doing nothing other than allowing business to claim "input credits" which would not accrue any credit to business, just how will businees thrive as Lou claims. And more importantly why is the Chamber of Commerce all over this one? There is more to this than meets ny eye! The consumer is going to get hosed and they feel powerless to stop it. It will be interesting to see just how successful the NDP is going to be in the next BC by-election, with the HST as a central issue.
"Business will thrive" says Lou, but at whose expense? If there's anything we know about consumer economics is that there is only so much money to go around and all these moves in taxation shifts do is to move the burden. If the HST and the elimination of Provincial sales tax is doing nothing other than allowing business to claim "input credits" which would not accrue any credit to business, just how will businees thrive as Lou claims. And more importantly why is the Chamber of Commerce all over this one? There is more to this than meets ny eye! The consumer is going to get hosed and they feel powerless to stop it. It will be interesting to see just how successful the NDP is going to be in the next BC by-election, with the HST as a central issue.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)