Why would they do this?
So why do we have an item that will need background information in a report that is not in the package but will be released at the meeting. Are the contents of that item confidential, does the information need to be worked on over the weekend or are the contents of the report explosive if released two days before the meeting? Oh you ask what is the subject of this speculation? Why a report on "Victoria Park and Beach operations". Why hasn't this report been released to the public before the meeting and that would allow members of the public input into the meeting if they wanted it. Does the CAO think that by scheduling a public meeting, in the resolution, that that action obviates the need for public scrutiny prior to the meeting? What is in the report that neccessitates such a late release, and does this late release contravene the spirit and intent of the rules and procedures of Council concerning public information?
In another related matter, if you intend to go to Council on Monday don't go anywhere near the Old Bailey courtroom, the great experiment in "new democracy has fizzled out. The Mayor has decided despite spending $42,000 on the move that it doesn't work. Perhaps a public accounting of all the staff time and the cost of the facilities left behind as well as the cost of the transfer back to the old chambers might be in order! BTW thanks to a sharp citizen who put me on to this.



