Yesterday Andrew McFadyen came to town, and Kim Rudd must have passed him on County Rd 29 as she went out to Warkworth, (one of Andrew's home bases) to drink wine. But I went to see Andrew, Kim can wait until she does Cobourg on Saturday.
In a celebration of the past Andrew introduced himself to many of his supporters at the Best Western at 5pm. Speaking for nine minutes, after an hour of mingling, he paid homage to the party elders, attacked the sitting government and spoke about why he was running to be the candidate.
Introduced by the Rt Hon Christine Stewart, who started her address with, "All Liberals are looking forward to an election" she spoke about Andrew in the most glowing of terms. Andrew then thanked all of his predecessors profusely , praising Paul Macklin, but avoided sanctifying him, praised his campaign team for five months of hard work and then pointed out to the seventy-five or so party faithful that the sitting government of Mr Harper, represented by Rick Norlock,
has been unresponsive to the needs of the Riding and must be changed. He then explained his passion for the position by explaining some of his childhood, experienced under the Harris Tories, had made him much stronger and independent - he was raised in a one-parent family home by a mother on disability. Consequently he had to work eight hour shifts at the age of fourteen. As he implied that the Harper cons are the same as the Harrisites, he obviously doesn't want any part of that kind of society and "wants to be an advocate for your needs."
My impressions of the event are simple, with the number of people, in the audience, under the age of sixty able to be counted on one hand Andrew had better hope that they get a quick election, some of them might not make it. A local Liberal mentioned to me that about half the audience was from out of town and I didn't recognise too many local folks either. Andrew scores highly for motivation and sincerity as well as being well connected with the party brass. So first impressions make him stand out as a capable candidate. But as another local Lib said, "We are so lucky to have three good candidates running." My money is still on who has signed up the most - it's a numbers game as many minds were not changed by this event.
Congratulations to the readers, you made yesterday the most active of all pages in our history. Without releasing actual numbers, they would scare the opposition, the discussion about the cheeky chappy and the zealous cop, who happened to be female, released the opinion dogs and drove up the hits.
In a celebration of the past Andrew introduced himself to many of his supporters at the Best Western at 5pm. Speaking for nine minutes, after an hour of mingling, he paid homage to the party elders, attacked the sitting government and spoke about why he was running to be the candidate.
Introduced by the Rt Hon Christine Stewart, who started her address with, "All Liberals are looking forward to an election" she spoke about Andrew in the most glowing of terms. Andrew then thanked all of his predecessors profusely , praising Paul Macklin, but avoided sanctifying him, praised his campaign team for five months of hard work and then pointed out to the seventy-five or so party faithful that the sitting government of Mr Harper, represented by Rick Norlock,
has been unresponsive to the needs of the Riding and must be changed. He then explained his passion for the position by explaining some of his childhood, experienced under the Harris Tories, had made him much stronger and independent - he was raised in a one-parent family home by a mother on disability. Consequently he had to work eight hour shifts at the age of fourteen. As he implied that the Harper cons are the same as the Harrisites, he obviously doesn't want any part of that kind of society and "wants to be an advocate for your needs."My impressions of the event are simple, with the number of people, in the audience, under the age of sixty able to be counted on one hand Andrew had better hope that they get a quick election, some of them might not make it. A local Liberal mentioned to me that about half the audience was from out of town and I didn't recognise too many local folks either. Andrew scores highly for motivation and sincerity as well as being well connected with the party brass. So first impressions make him stand out as a capable candidate. But as another local Lib said, "We are so lucky to have three good candidates running." My money is still on who has signed up the most - it's a numbers game as many minds were not changed by this event.
Congratulations to the readers, you made yesterday the most active of all pages in our history. Without releasing actual numbers, they would scare the opposition, the discussion about the cheeky chappy and the zealous cop, who happened to be female, released the opinion dogs and drove up the hits.


17 comments:
I beg to differ... I was one of the Liberals in the crowd at Andrew's event yesterday, and from speaking with others, a lot of them made up their mind to support Andrew after such a great event.
I'm not a part of the 'over 60' crowd you refer to, but I don't really see the problem - a Liberal is a Liberal and a vote of support is a vote of support, regardless of age.
Elizabeth, but that's the point one should wait until one has met all candidates before making up one's mind, n'est pas
ben
It was a big turnout at the Weston Hotel. Many Liberals came out to see if they would support Andrew McFadyen as their candidate. The sign-up table was busy and in the discussion circles after his speech the consensus was that Andrew had gained their support.
perhaps anonymous they didn't come to have minds changed but their choice confirmed, quite a difference!
ben
I was at the meeting yesterday as well . I can't speak for others, who may already know the other canidates, but I need to meet all the candidates, in person, before choosing whom to support. An important thing to be looking for is the candidate best suited to confront Rick Norloch and the Conservatives on some pretty basic issues. The real test and who's got the stomach for it.
Yesterday, Andrew drew the right comparison between the present government and the Mike Harris years. That's a start.
The Libs could put up just about anyone for election and I would vote for them over Norlock.
But then, come to think of it, that's how we got Rinaldi, and he has not exactly impressed with his performance. At least with Galt we knew what he stood for, unlike Lil Lou and his gang of smarmy opportunists.
Benjamin - just to make a small correction, the term "Rt Hon" is reserved for very specific people, among whom are Prime Ministers, Members of the Privy Council, the Chief Justice of Canada and the Governor General of Canada. Christine Stewart is, nor has ever been, any of these so she is not entitled to that Title. Please correct me if I'm in error.
"Without releasing actual numbers, they would scare the opposition" - Who could possibly be considered as an "opposition" to your blog , Ben? - what is the basis for the opposition to which you refer? This sounds interesting.
perhaps my bunker mentality is showing but if I was to reveal a low number many could say, I told you nobody reads that stuff. On the the hand too high a number would attract a call for verification, let's leave it and let the world guess.
Well, Frank, if you want someone ready, willing, and able "to confront Rick Norloch and the Conservatives on some pretty basic issues," you won't be looking at Liberals. They are all following their wimp of a leader who, last January, could have had "Rt. Hon." before his name, but didn't have the stomach for it.
Well, William , we won't have to wait long. Once the plug goes on the Conservative government we'll see if the man is the wimp you describe. We already know the alternatives.
Speaking of Harper, I've notice something interesting lately that comes mostly from Globe And Mail editorials and columns. It wasn't long ago that every time Stephen Harper was mentioned, usually regarding his control freak mentality, the criticism was always tempered with something like "...how can a man as intelligent as Stephen Harper let his emotions rule his policy?" Or somesuch. Whatever -but the word "intelligent" was always inserted.
That isn't the case anymore. You just don't see examples of his formerly much-vaunted intellect being tossed around. Did he suddenly lose thirty or forty IQ points? Or is it a case of The Emperor's New Clothes?
Personally, I never saw the prime minister as a particularly bright guy. Certainly I wouldn't want to be stuck next to him on a flight to Australia or even in the 8-items-or-less at the No Frills. I happen to think he is what he's always been -a geek. And a policy wonk to boot.
Has anyone else noticed the missing "intelligent" quotient?
DJC
I am on Andrew's team and I am 43. About half of the team is younger than me, the other half is older. It's a good mix, we work well together, all respecting and learning from each other.
My three teenage children and many of their friends are avid Andrew supporters. Until they met Andrew they had no interest in politics. A wine and cheese event is not intended for the youth members of the party. Team McFadyen hosted a beach vollyball day late last month. It was well attended by teens and college aged kids. My kids feel like they are respected and valued by the McFadyen team.
I am waiting to see and hear ALL THREE of the candidates before making up my mind. I feel the strongest (most experienced) will soon be visiting Cobourg soon.
Frank G wrote: "Once the plug goes on the Conservative government we'll see if the man is the wimp you describe."
Except for the wimp, who has blocked the drain for 8 months, the Conservative government would have been gone long ago. The wimp IS the plug. With luck, he will drain away with the government.
Checked out McFadyen's web site last night and it was downright scary.
He's just way too smooth. Looking alot like that android Data on Star Trek Next Generation, he just doesn't seem quite real.
Can't help but think that all his cute little blog posts and twitter entries are actually written by a committee and then reviewed by a focus group before being posted.
Nope, way too smooth for this riding. Our locals will have a hard time trusting this guy.
Best to stay under the radar on this one, methinks.
I agree with the "smooth operator" assessment that blends a little into the icky territory.
It really confuses me though because he's supposed to be so professional and slick, but he has a hideously tacky website. It just doesn't seem to fit.
Then again, I had a friend that was a "web designer" and I let him do my first website because, well, he was my friend. It turned out almost as bad as Andrew's. I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume it was somehow an act of kindness to let an amateur design the website.
Post a Comment