Special Diet Allowance Drama Drags On
While the term special diet allowance may not mean much to most of us, for people on Ontario Works or the Ontario Disability Support Program it is a crucial program that provides an extra few dollars monthly to pay for food needed due to certain medical conditions. The program has been around for a very long time with little fanfare.
After rates were drastically cut in the mid 90's, and inflation further eroded benefit levels in the ensuing years, recipients, legal clinic workers and activists began looking for a way, any way, to increase peoples' income, and the little used special diet allowance became a mechanism to do that. Paying anywhere from $10 extra up to $250 in extreme cases, more and more people began asking their doctors to fill out the forms to qualify them for the program.
When the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty, and other groups began recruiting doctors around the province to hold clinics for recipients, the costs of providing the program grew and government, now under Dalton McGuinty's liberals, cut it back drastically by eliminating some medical conditions and making the rules harder to meet. This was done in 2005, and countless people lost their allowance as a result. Even though the government's own advisory committee recommended expanding the program later on, little action was taken.
In response to the cuts, some 800 people filed appeals to the Social Benefits Tribunal, which hears appeals of social assistance decisions. Likewise about 200 complaints were filed with the Human Rights Commission, and then transferred to the Human Rights Tribunal when it was established.
Last week, finally, the Human Rights Tribunal released its decision on the 3 lead cases, and found that the Province did indeed violate the human rights code in each instance. The Tribunal ordered it to re-instate full benefits to them, as well as anyone else in the system with those particular medical conditions.
Now, hopefully, the rest of the cases can proceed, following the reasoning applied in the lead cases. All 800 appeals to the Social Benefits Tribunal have been adjourned for years now, waiting for the Human Rights Tribunal to rule.
But the Province seems poised to ignore their own Human Rights code. In an internal memo circulated around the Social Services Ministry the possibility of abolishing the Special Diet Allowance entirely has been raised, and the government has not denied this is their plan.
We should all be outraged by this latest cynical threat to the security of people on social assistance. Living well below the poverty line, let us not forget a single person on welfare gets a scant $600 a month, still $63 less than would have been paid out in 1995 before Mike the Knife slashed the rates. Many welfare recipients suffer from disabilities, and the ability to eat properly is critical for their health.
Of course if the rates were increased to provide an adequate standard of living, special diet allowances wouldn't be required, and that is the ultimate solution to this problem. Don't hold your breath for the Province to do the right thing though. If they are prepared to ignore their own advisory committee as well as the Human Rights Tribunal decision, we are all in big trouble. Poverty reduction indeed.
After rates were drastically cut in the mid 90's, and inflation further eroded benefit levels in the ensuing years, recipients, legal clinic workers and activists began looking for a way, any way, to increase peoples' income, and the little used special diet allowance became a mechanism to do that. Paying anywhere from $10 extra up to $250 in extreme cases, more and more people began asking their doctors to fill out the forms to qualify them for the program.
When the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty, and other groups began recruiting doctors around the province to hold clinics for recipients, the costs of providing the program grew and government, now under Dalton McGuinty's liberals, cut it back drastically by eliminating some medical conditions and making the rules harder to meet. This was done in 2005, and countless people lost their allowance as a result. Even though the government's own advisory committee recommended expanding the program later on, little action was taken.
In response to the cuts, some 800 people filed appeals to the Social Benefits Tribunal, which hears appeals of social assistance decisions. Likewise about 200 complaints were filed with the Human Rights Commission, and then transferred to the Human Rights Tribunal when it was established.
Last week, finally, the Human Rights Tribunal released its decision on the 3 lead cases, and found that the Province did indeed violate the human rights code in each instance. The Tribunal ordered it to re-instate full benefits to them, as well as anyone else in the system with those particular medical conditions.
Now, hopefully, the rest of the cases can proceed, following the reasoning applied in the lead cases. All 800 appeals to the Social Benefits Tribunal have been adjourned for years now, waiting for the Human Rights Tribunal to rule.
But the Province seems poised to ignore their own Human Rights code. In an internal memo circulated around the Social Services Ministry the possibility of abolishing the Special Diet Allowance entirely has been raised, and the government has not denied this is their plan.
We should all be outraged by this latest cynical threat to the security of people on social assistance. Living well below the poverty line, let us not forget a single person on welfare gets a scant $600 a month, still $63 less than would have been paid out in 1995 before Mike the Knife slashed the rates. Many welfare recipients suffer from disabilities, and the ability to eat properly is critical for their health.
Of course if the rates were increased to provide an adequate standard of living, special diet allowances wouldn't be required, and that is the ultimate solution to this problem. Don't hold your breath for the Province to do the right thing though. If they are prepared to ignore their own advisory committee as well as the Human Rights Tribunal decision, we are all in big trouble. Poverty reduction indeed.
2 comments:
Ebenezer: Are there no prisons?
First Collector: Plenty of prisons.
Ebenezer: And the union workhouses - are they still in operation?
First Collector: They are. I wish I could say they were not.
Ebenezer: Oh, from what you said at first I was afraid that something had happened to stop them in their useful course. I'm very glad to hear it.
First Collector: I don't think you quite understand us, sir. A few of us are endeavoring to buy the poor some meat and drink, and means of warmth.
"All 800 appeals to the Social Benefits Tribunal have been adjourned for years now, waiting for the Human Rights Tribunal to rule."
The Inhuman Rights Commissions/Tribunals are notoriously glacial, consuming years of deliberations at enormous expense to the taxpayers.
Such issues that you have raised here might well have been expedited sooner if these bureaucrazies ceased wasting their time and our money on the 'progressive' business of vetting free speech to save the lives of vulnerable 14 year old girls.
Post a Comment