Tomorrow is Nom-Day

Tomorrow's the day for Pat Clark, I bet he will remember this one for a long time.
First public appearance, having to say something meaningful for the audience, Wanting to make a good impression and above all, not look like a young twit. Go for it Pat you can do it. Hope to see you all out - even non-members are welcome.

It feels good when it stops!

As you know I have a spotty record in math calculations, so hack away at these observations!
The image on the left shows the latest addition to our household - the Smart Meter. You know those gizmos that will make us all educated and wiser users of hydro. At a cost of over a million dollars all household units in Cobourg will have one of these fitted by the local utility company LUSI.
The rationale, touted by all supporters of the device, is that consumers will now have the freedom to choose how to save money by selecting which time period they use when consuming hydro. What a load of bollocks!
This move to smart meters is the biggest moneygrab in the history of the province. A stealthy move designed to get consumers to pay more for hydro.
Hydro pricing has been a political football ever since Mike Harris destroyed the stable forty year amortisation of capital costs repayment programme for ideological purposes.
We currently pay 5.7 cents for a kw/hour on the basic allowance per household of 1260 kw/hrs. That means if granny, wrapped in sweaters, keeps her usage down to the minimum she will only pay $71.82 per billing period. Under the new program of time choosing, the basic price of $.57 goes to $.68 (this is obtained by calculating the average cost per hour - cheapest being $.42 and most expensive being $.91 over a 24 hour period). So without even being given the freedom to choose when one can use hydro, the price has jumped 19.74%.
When one looks at the periods that one can choose to use hydro and consequently shift their consumption times, there are costs that cannot be shifted - heating costs, cooking times etc. So to try to con us with buzzwords like "consumer choice" is fraudulent. There are very few moves left to do that the educated consumer can now do to save hydro costs: they have already converted light bulbs, they already have fitted programmeable thermostats, most are aware of the benefits of high efficiency appliances and furnaces - some have converted. So not only are we accused of being ignorant for not doing these things but now are hit with a huge hydro increase and then told we can save money. And, to add insult to injury, we will be paying for these smart meters on our bills (estimated at $4.00 per month).
Remember photo radar? It became a symbol of political unrest and rebellion. Smart Meters have the capability to become such a symbol - an impotent device that we have to pay for. The first political party pledging to remove them them will garner votes, and lots of them.

If you want to see how much of your money has been wasted on this promotion of a moneygrab look here it is a glitzy flash interactive web site of a fictional house that uses typical appliances. I defy any of you with the patience to use this site properly to believe the results.

A question for the local news, including the BurdReport

Last week I received emails pointing us to Wally Keeler's local online journal (read the details here), our cultural affairs correspondent, wherein he outlined a story about local businessman Jim Corcoran (he owns St Ann's Spa) and his pending lawsuit against the Catholic Diocese of Peterborough and 12 local Cobourg parishioners. The story is that Mr Corcoran, an admitted, but chaste for 19 years, homosexual began to serve the sacrament just before last Christmas. Twelve local parishioners objected, wrote a letter to the Bishop and Mr Corcoran was removed. Mr Corcoran responded by filing a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission and is personally suing the twelve parishioners and the Bishop for $25,000 a piece.and the people named in the suit could be fined up to $25,000 (source "Catholic register").

Now the question - where was the local MSM in this, nary a comment even though the story was out there for the picking. It has only come to light now because the National Post has a piece about it this morning here. The sad part here, for MSM advocates, is that it was a rabid homophobic 'family values' site that broke the story early last week, beating the MSM to the punch.

This is where the MSM is - covering Dalton. The Lib spin machine is in full bloom taking advantage of the summer dearth of news and to announce an announcement, probably one of "old money" being re-announced. Put the above story with this one and you get a local MSM not willing to rock the advertisers and pump out political spin because it is safe. Really ,how many 'real people' will be there to see Dalton anyway?

Another piece of locally significant news was the announcement that the local hospital is setting up a "Citizens' Advisory Panel". This group of folks will be the sounding board for the bad news of cuts in the hospital budget. As part of the contingency plan, where the budget is balanced, a "community engagement plan" has to be filed with the LHIN before such a contingency plan can be approved. A Queen's Park requirement that is such total BS that it stinks even from there. The idea is that the public can be brought on side with the proper massaging and consultation. Rather like putting five people in a room and saying to each of them, "You all have to lose a limb, what will volunteer to cut off - an arm or a leg?"

Two problems with this idea - the idea itself; that unpalatable decisions are more acceptable if the dirty work is done by some people other than the Board who are elected to make the dirty decisions and the fact that cutbacks are mandated by a remote central body like the LHIN. When the idea was being floated I assumed that the CAP would be a vehicle of consultation led by local people who would talk to others in the community and form community opinion. But talking to the CAO he thinks that the discussion will remain in the room of the appointed people. Whoa Nelly, where is the legitimacy in that? Who gets to speak for me and when do I get to speak to them?

A bit redundant we have an open membership that elects a Board, based on regional demographics and geographic representation and that Board is expected to make decisions. But in this case, probably the most important decision they will make this year - the budget, they decide to delegate their representative responsibilities - sad.

Money items today

Finally the Provincial Government has canned the head of e-Health Ontario. This agency was established from the ashes of its predecessor agency that that was dismantled after spending over 600 million with no results, this came after another fiasco with computers a few years earlier with computerized land records and another with welfare systems. Anyway the Head of e-health presided over eight months of gravytraining and questionable contracts awarded to buddies and one alleged family member. So what does Sarah Kramer get for her supposed expertise? Nine months salary at $26,500 per month, a bonus of $114K after five months and a severance of $317K to go away and not sue them for breach of contract. A total of $700K for nine months work; nice if you can get it. No wonder the opposition and the news people are all over this, it is salacious. But the scandal here isn't the obscene wages being paid to civil servants to administer outrageous consultants fees but the inability of any government to understand how computers work and the cost of networking lots of them. Because it is technology that most MPs do not even understand they are prepared to pay the ridiculous fees demanded by computer specialists, sad!

Back to the local scene, we now know how much money the local pols pulled in for doing a part time job. Last month the County published its "remuneration report" which details the amounts paid to councillors for being at the County level. Tonight the Cobourg report will be published it is here for those who missed it on the agenda [it never appeared on the agenda, the memos never Are - Ed] it shows all on the Council payroll.
But the big thing for Cobourgers to note is that the Mayor by attending a monthly meeting at the County is able to bump up his $30,272 + expenses of $3,482 ($33,754) by adding his County money - $9588 - for a total of $43,342 but you then have to add in the money he gets from the Local Utility for being a Director of the Company and the money he gets for being a Director of a subsidiary ($4,500 estimated total) and that comes up to a grand total of $47,842. Not bad for a job that could be called full time, if he worked at it constantly.
The sad part of this is that although most people I talk to hold the Council in low esteem for their actions over the past few years and complain about a lack of vision nobody is chomping at the bit to want to be the next mayor, even if it pays a respectable stipend.