A rumour confirmed

Earlier this week I heard that the Kraft property has been sold. The way the story goes is that two smart businessmen with a background in Scrap and Salvage, had bought the place to strip it out. Apparently Kraft sold it the way it is complete with some forklifts, the rumour said over 40. Anyway these guys allegedly have already leased out the Lab area to the County, presumably for the Land Ambulances who were looking for a home. The rest of the area has a fortune in scrap metal and raw inventory. Good luck to them but in order to remain less critical than normal we will have to wait and see just what other businesses these guy will put in there. I guess any sale would be deemed a success to a Council that is so "laissez-faire" it gives the French a bad name. Can't wait for the Town Crier to welcome the first Rolloff truck on its way to do business into the community! Another opportunity wasted. The Town could have done this months ago. Just put that "play money" into action, hire a project manager and we could have made money for the taxpayer.

PS I stand to be corrected if this rumour doesn't pan out.

Love those conservative editorials. I read a lot of online stuff and it runs the gamut. Here is an editorial from the las Vegas Review and Journal. It details some background to the AIG bonus outrage. BTW I feel that the rage is all phony designed to make lawmakers look good in a very embarrassing situation.

Who said journalism is dead, we still have backgrounders amongst us. How about this one describing just who got what in the AIG mess.

He's back in the public eye

Mike Harris, remember him? Well he's poked his head over the trenches at the law firm he's bunkered in and is back here Reputedly to be working his rolodex and calling party members to support the leadership hopes of Tim Hudak. Well the TO Star acts as though this is a big surprise - duh. Why would MH support anybody else? Hudak is married to the wicked witch of the revolution - Deb Hutton, Harris's righthand hatchet person. If these are the people on Hudak's team Christine Elliot doesn't stand a chance - never mind who her husband is!


In another vein here is a interesting piece written by Jo Cruddas MP for Dagenham entitled new socialism it is a new take on an old problem - dogma.

Remember when I asked who GritGirl was?

Well now somebody called Toryboy1 has appeared on the internet using the same style of videos as GritGirl we now get the other side of the story:
I just wonder who is paying for these things.

How about this a Minister of Science that will not acknowledge science

“I'm not going to answer that question. I am a Christian, and I don't think anybody asking a question about my religion is appropriate,” Gary Goodyear, the federal Minister of State for Science and Technology, said in an interview with The Globe and Mail. In this story here Gary Goodyear will not tell us if he believes in evolution. Leading some in the science community to speculate that he is a "creationist"

Speculation proves to be true

In this story Bob, I have troubling making my mind up, Spooner told Cobourg just what the BurdReport suspected a couple of days ago. There will be no aquatic facility in the new MULTI Million dollar recreation facility (CCC), and you know why --- because the YMCA has one. Well tough for them if the Town builds one, we need one and it should be in the CCC. In fact this study fails to do what irtshould have been told to do, and wasn't - consolidate recreational facilities under municipal control.
If all we are going to get out of the MILLIONS of dollars spent on this thing is more hockey facilities we have failed the general population of the Town and caved to the hockey rink rats and moms who hang out at the rink. Is hockey a rising demographic, are the facilities we have overloaded, could that overload be accomodated by one more pad instead of three? We will never know as this report will not change much in the travels through bureaucracy. So we started off with a simple request for more floor space by Seniors and ended up with an Arena fit for a Junior A team - some metamorphis!

Is this the future of newspapers?

The "SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER: 1863-2009" is the tribute to the end of a print newspaper. However as it ends the paper era it is asking that all of its loyal readers go to the online version here.
Will it work and is this webpage any different from any other newspaper webpage, and will it retain or repel readers? These questions are up for answering, but what we do know is that ad revenue is down and the operating costs of papers are the same, a lttle lower now that newsprint prices have tumbled, so deficits loom.
Joel Connelly write an op-ed piece extolling the virtue of the new online venture (he would,and as a survivor of the move he'd better make it work to save his job) here . However all of these optimists forget one thing - advertising revenue. You still need lots of it and it's hard to fit it into an online design without becoming overpowering.
I bet the Sun-Media gurus are watching this move very carefully, why else would the new consolidated Northumberland paper have .com in its title. Perhaps the most telling argument against local success in the online edition of both local papers is that the "interactive part" - blogs and comments sections are not well used. Can't say I blame the journos who have been asked to write blogs, what is there to say after you have banged out the maximum number of words for a pay cheque? And checking the names of the commenters there a few who I recognise as being multiple posters - they will comment on all and sundry no matter where the operation is.
Drudge has posted this link wherein former staffers of the Rocky Mountain News, the latest large market newspaper to shut down leaving inhabitants of a large urban area without newspaper coverage, have announced their answer to the problem. They will offer free content but charge a subscription for commentary and special content.
For another in depth look at the problem read this only on the web would you get this much distribution of such a long article (for instance in the NT.com columnists have been told to reduce their contributions from 750 words to 400. An edict like that would never happen online.

Finally back to the top here is a video from Seattle. It may take time to load, it's a busy day in Seattle today!

It goes on and on today, I guess the failure of the Seattle PI has brought everybody in on the discussion, here is an opinion about how the Internet will save local papers. I can really relate to this one. The hits on this site have doubled in the last two weeks. Now why is that? perhaps local content reigned supreme in the last couple of days!

A nice tidy job!

The Spooner affair will be put to bed next Monday when the committee report will reveal that the vote to put Miriam in her place will remain at 5-2. So much for Spooner's efforts to stay on side.

Into the Breach

This is the ad that pushes the biggest load of BS that I have seen for many days. Not that Earth Day isn't important for outlining the need to conserve the Earth's resources. Where the BS comes in is the great PR campaign by local municipalities to push the idea that we should all switch our lights off to bring attention to the matter. Talk about "bread and circuses" this push by our local leaders is an exercise in hypocricy and designed to make them look good whilst doing not much.
What these guys should be doing is to not put up hydro rates to maintain their revenue in the declining consumptive environment. What they should be doing is to establish teams of reno-conservation tradesmen and then back up those teams with grants to fix up our houses. We have been bombarded with exhortations for years now from all kinds of agencies to reduce our consumption and fix up our old and leaky houses, yet people still ignore those pleadings - Why?
Probably because they don't have the money to take advantage of the offers to renovate. They are reeling under the increases that utilities have demanded. If governments want us to reduce, let them help pay for it. Slick PR campaigns are just that - spin to make politicians feel good. If they want to good things mandate energy audits, enter every house and take stock. Make the bad homeowners fix up their houses and have the utilities pay for it. Local utilities should not be penalised by the market place for declining revenues brought on by reduced consumption. The Province saves money by not having to expand the hydro production and transmission systems, they should compensate local utilities from those savings.
How about working on the real problems instead of engaging in silly games that only illustrate the stupid competition between local municipalities!

Just a quick Sunday post

Manfred Schumann has copied me a letter that he has written to NT.com and I decided to rerun it here as it may not be published because he has already written about the situation and been published. So here it is:
Dear Editor,
Until now, the recent "censure" fiasco at Cobourg Council could have been cast as a minor blemish but that is no longer accurate. It has quickly become something more comparable to an infected pimple, or worse, an abscess, in a sensitive nether-region.

While the debate circles around words implied yet unspoken, questions characterized as accusations, anonymities and revelations, it has yet to be dealt with in an honest and forthright manner, in order to set the records straight and provide, to the public, a factual explanation of the issue. That one issue, as it was, has now erupted into several more. It reminds me of the theorem 'lies beget lies'.

As everyone who has been in attendance is aware, the issue stems from one councillor asking a straight forward and perfectly legitimate question (or two). Instead of a simple answer, the response was framed as an accusation of impropriety and interestingly remains unanswered. Subsequently, compromise turns into betrayal as names are made public by a third but significant party (mayor). Immediately, the original question is yet again characterized by the deputy-mayor, as an outright accusation aimed at those now publicly named, and is further vilified as an attack on staff who have no means of self-defense in the public forum, where they were surprisingly thrust by the third-party's (mayor) highly improper revelation just moments before.

While council accepts without question, such an improper and treacherous betrayal of a confidence in open council and then votes to censure a perfectly legitimate question of process by a councillor, is incredibly valuable material for a study in municipal practices that are close enough to being corrupt that light would not pass through that gap. Such conduct is not often found in isolation, but as an escalation and further deterioration of practices already exhibiting dubious tendencies. Why should this be any different. This is where scandals find their genesis.

To complicate the matter even further, the records show the vote to censure resulted in a 5 - 2 count in favour. However, since then, a purported 'correction' has apparently been noted by the flip-flop councillor to amend the vote to 6 - 1. Rules of order are clear on what must be done to change the record of a vote, and that has not yet been done here. More shenanigans! - just when we thought it was as bad as it could get. Can the 'C' word be far behind?

As we can all see, 'perplexing' is heavily outvoted by 'deplorable' as an appropriate word to describe what has been going on and shows no sign of abating in this council's term. As more such instances occur, as they are likely to, the decline of confidence in this council will gather momentum and the securely entrenched 'old guard' has no one to blame but itself.

Just as the blemish becomes a pimple, the festering underneath creates a full-blown boil, and the only remedy for healing to begin is a lancing to exorcise the underlying infection that characterizes the antagonism, revilement, viciousness, ostracism, distrust, and cronyism that appears to be emerging from this collective we acknowledge as our council. The question is - how?

M. Schumann
Cobourg
905-372-8906
Mar. 13, 2009

So after much money this is what we get

This is the portion of tomorrow's agenda for the CoW to discuss. It is a recommendation from the highly paid consultants, that studied the need for a Recreation/Community Centre. Look carefully and you will see that a key component of any Community Centre - a swimming pool is missing. So the Hockey guys get THREE pads and the swimmers still have to pay above market prices in a small pool at the NON-profit YMCA, of which we pay to uphold.
Silly me I thought the idea of such a grandiose scheme was to consolidate recreational needs and that includes cutting off the annual subsidy to the YMCA because we will need every penny for this. But if the nabobs and manipulators leave out a swimming pool then the Y can get the subsidy and the taxpayer still gets the shaft.
BTW the site for this grandiose structure has yet to be announced it was buried in the report that was not posted on the internet. There are seven sites and one involves using existing soccer fields, but the CSC has been promised replacement fields (further adding to the end cost!)