Are elected officials allowed to have private opinions?
I would hope so but not according the the local arbiter of morals and taste - the cobourg daily star. In an editorial excoriating the local school board trustee for expressing his opinion about immigration and in the wake of the white folks at the school board passing a motion of censure, because his views on immigration conflicted with the PC position on diversity; the debate is not over. The question is, can an elected official hold obnoxious views? Of course and until the local school board makes Gordon Gilchrist wear official pajamas then he can say anything he wants on his own time. The school board doesn't pay enough to take over ones life and brain so they should expect trustees to say foolish things, and it is good that they do, it proves that they are human and have foibles. After all this is not the first time we have had Cobourg trustees saying obnoxious things and being flamed for it. Bob, I should be Mayor, Spooner, when he was a trustee ran into trouble when he made comments about Jamaicans and their propensity for crime and was roundly criticised by all involved. All I can say is that people say obnoxious things and offend other people and that is their right, but it does make them look foolish. If they want to take the risk good for them because what's the alternative - self-censorship and that should be a hanging offense!
Will Hillary be booted out this week?
This subject is a hot one in our house, the love of my life intensely dislikes HC, mainly because she stood by her man, and also is a fan of Oprah, "what she likes - I like". So my choice of HC is looking more like road kill every day. If she doesn't come through on Tuesday she will be toast. Pundits have gone crazy on this topic and I really think that the coverage has not been fair. Obama has been given a free ride, but who cares, he is on a roll. Come November when when he has had months of fighting McCain he will not be looking so good and his platitudes will be wearing thin.
Prince Harry is home!
So the third in line has completed 10 weeks of a 14 week combat tour and the papparazi were muted. Good for him. After all of this be prepared for news of him completing secret training in the special services, a branch of the Army where disappearances are expected and common place.
Not the final word on the Monstrosity at the Lake
Council has obstinately upheld the voting split and forged forward with a motion to retender the concrete blob that will mar the green space at the waterfront. The local paper has been bombarded with a vast quantity of letters that denounce the vote. The taxpayers still do not know the estimated operating costs and are outraged at the sums of money that have gone to the consultants up to this point. What can be done now? Unfortunately not much, there are still voting points left in the process - one to award the tender and one to adopt the money allocated within the budget, but that will not bother the "four dead white men". The problem is that the protesters are now known as agitators, objectors and the usual suspects in the eyes of Council. As such if any of them appear before Council to speak they will not be listened to and also run the risk of losing public support "because they protestoth too much". For any campaign to succeed it must be seen as positive - bring on the campaign for a community centre.