"Polls are for dogs!"
Remember the Heritage Crime, that has been committed on Chapel St? The only "Jackson House" to be designated (136 Chapel St) has been a victim of a savage renovation committed by an owner with no appreciation for its heritage and history. The front porch has been destroyed and new, and ill suited windows and doors fitted all done without permits. Council will tonight refuse to issue a permit for a porch replacement. I can hardly wait to hear the outlining of the next steps. After all they do have the power to order the owner to restore the house to its original condition, or do they?
The only published number for the Lib-Nom is now 454. That is the number advertised as supporters of Kim Rudd. With that number is it over for the others and will it be a first ballot victory for the 'Principal'? If those numbers are actual signed members and if every one of them votes (which will be a stretch) Ms Rudd will be feeling pretty cocky going into the All Candidates Meeting on Sunday. Look at the numbers: if a 1000 people attend the voting, it will be lower than last time as the candidates have failed to sign up 'crossovers', and she has 454 signed up there will be a few undeclared who will come across and she may get to 600 by the Nom-date. If that's the case the rationale for publishing unsubstantiated numbers on the website will encourage all of the 'sheep' - those who always sniff out the winner and jump on the coattails, to join in. Yep folks you may have a winner already. But pure speculation, the big question is how will she take defeat in the real election, next Spring? BTW as I am on Lib news perhaps the webmasters could take a couple of hints - update, and update. One paragraph and a pdf isn't really an update for CH. AMcF hasn't done a thing for a month and it shouldn't take 3 clicks and ten seconds to get to the meat of the KR site, flash doesn't impress anymore - content and more content. Hint - put the updates on page 1 we are impatient surfers!









