What is the undercurrent of Conflict of Interest at Cobourg Council? Reports of heated words at last Monday's Council meeting appeared in the MSM this week.
NNews here In a description of the event by a Council watcher who was at the meeting and submitted as a comment to a previous post, below, an undercurrent of a potential C of I involving a mystery councillor emerges.
"During earlier discussions about the makeup of the committee struck to assess the bids for the engineering consultants contract, Miriam asked if there had been any disclosures, or was there a need for any disclosures, concerning potential conflict of interests on the part of any members of the committee. One would deduce from her question that she had wind of some questionable choices and at one time she questioned if there was any kind of possible connection between any member of the committee and any one in the employment, at some point, of one of the firms bidding for the contract. Both McCaughey and Brocanier took exception to her questions and spoke at council about it, with McCaughey demanding a formal apology from her. Miriam flew off the handle and told McCaughey in no uncertain terms that he was "the last person on earth in a position to demand such an apology!" to which McCaughey put his tail between his legs and sat down. Before that skirmish, Brocanier asked for an apology, Miriam did not respond directly, the mayor asked Miriam if she was prepared to offer an apology and she emphatically stated that she was not prepared to do so. In that moment of nothingness, McCaughey made his embarrassing stab at it."Will the world know what is going on? Perhaps not but details will filter out via the "dead white man's club" in time. As conspiracy theorists know nothing stays silent long, especially in the case of older conspiracies, as people die off they want to confess. Not saying that Bob Spooner is dying off but he will probably let his colleagues at the Dutch oven in on the secret.
I was intrigued by a National Post article about Conrad Black. As we all know he is prison in Florida serving a six year sentence for bilking shareholders. In
this collection of email answers to questions posed by Theresa Tedesco he describes what he is up to. What I find interesting is the connection, made by observers, that great writing often emerges from people in prison. I guess they use the time productively!. In Black's case he is an historian and therefore he can effectively write about the impact of both liars and cheats in his case and whether he will be vindicated by the facts.
I guess Bob Rae is in a state of vindication amid reports that Dalton McGuinty's response to the looming depression is to unleash cases of red ink at the problem. The interesting thing in this case is just how it is perfectly alright for Dalton to run a deficit and Bob Rae was pilloried for doing the same thing. My response to that is that DM is not out of favour with the voters. BR never had the approval of anybody other than his supporters at the start and they rapidly dwindled as he ruled by ignoring party policy. It's hard to govern with only 38% support at the best of times - just ask Harper how hard it is! So run the deficits Dalton, the province is with you!
"Just get the money out there, mistakes be damned" that's the message from the Federal Government. So what mistakes can we expect? One that is emerging very quickly is the charge leveled by opposition MPs is that Conservative MPs are getting a leg up in the infrastructure applications. Let's hope that that's not true. "Follow the Money" Jerry McGuire used to say and in this case I hope that the MSM will do just that and expose any cases of "porkbarreling" in Con Ridings.