Back to the grindstone

Ribfest, was it good for you? The weather cooperated, outsiders came to Town and people gorged, music played (more on that later) and the Rotary Club expanded its coffers. Obviously a success! Some questions that came to me in conversation or email that people in authority should answer, as they are being asked by people in the Donut shop: one, is it about time to revisit the noise bylaw? Music in the Park is a subjective thing based on genre. But one thing we can agree on is that when the music is electronic it is very loud. Noise regulation seems to kick in after 11pm and upon complaint, but if the noise bylaw is based on "the disturbance to one's quality of life" then an argument can be made to tone it down before that time too. When a band in Vic Park can be heard at Elgin St. surely it is a bit too loud no matter what time of day it is? Another point to be made is that if Council is crying the blues about cleanup costs and mess then I wonder if, as well as dinging visitors by making them pay for parking, the vendors inside the park, on these occasions, shouldn't have to buy "Itinerant Traders' Licenses" to sell their wares?

Much discussion has taken place, especially by the idiots who drive old clunkers, about the nearly one hundred cars stopped and examined for mechanical defects last Friday. 22 cars were pulled off the road and warnings issued. But more importantly to those people who smoke the "indian ciggies" 8 warnings were issued to people who were seen to be in possession of them. Being told, "You can only smoke them on the reserve" may not seem like much of a warning but the $500 fine the next time you are found with them may deter a few from buying. After all when the "Revenooers" get on a kick like this expect a lot of attention to be paid to miscreants.

Expect the local Lib nominees to be a little fatter this morning. Eating and chatting all weekend adds on the pounds. Ribfest on Saturday and the Long lunch on Sunday and for CH, tonight little munchies at Tom Behan's house. Still it is only for a couple of weeks until the Party HQ drops the rope and allows nomination meetings to be set up. The next big event will be the All-Candidates meeting in Alderville August 30th, 2-5pm. Rumours and backbiting are a way of life in these kinds of contests, hence the little contretemps with Peter Delanty and who he supporting, with Kim Rudd sandbagged by his endorsement of Herrington. Today Delanty is covering all his bases by saying that he will support Rudd - if she wins!
But one of the wildest I have heard is that Herrington may only be in it to solidify her position as Lou Rinaldi's replacement in the next Provincial race. Let's face it if I were a Lib delegate I would be looking at these nominees with the end game in place - "Who will be the candidate in the election after this one," as the likelihood of the nominee actually winning this time is remote? An 11,000 vote deficit is a big gap to jump. So who of the three nominees will stay in if they lose?

Do we have two classes of citizenship? This would be the biggest election issue ever, if I was in the Lib backroom. With two cases of non-white citizens being screwed over in foreign countries and the lack of government support in helping them one can make a big case for two classes of citizens being given two kinds of Harper help. Just look at the efforts Norlock and Macklin went to to help Brenda Martin and then look at the appalling resistance to help offered to the woman in Kenya. If the Libs wanted to get their "immigrant vote" back from the grasping clutches of Jason Kenney's coercion machine then this issue is it.

We interrupt your lunch to bring you a nominee!

This weekend is a feast for gourmands as opposed to gourmets: Ribfest in Cobourg on Saturday and the Long Lunch on Sunday in Warkworth. BUT beware you may be interrupted in your greasy recreation by the possibility of Nominees attempting to get your vote - only if you are a Liberal the rest will be spoken to but dismissed as a waste of time.
Pols attending local functions is an old trick, which in these days of voter cynicism may backfire simply because Pols are universally disliked by the hoi-polloi. But not to be deterred Hizzoner Peter Delanty will be introducing Chris Herrington to all of his Rotary friends, which will be a total waste of time because the number of Liberals that belong to the Cobourg Rotary Club can be counted on two hands, and maybe a couple of toes. The rest of us will fail to notice the well dressed female hanging onto every one of PD's words Peter does tend to suck up surrounding air.
Both Kim Rudd and CH have announced plans to be at the event in Cobourg so they will be looking for you.

After being reminded in no uncertain terms I should be checking the nominees websites, as opposed to them sending out 'pressers' and reminders to the lazy media, I checked the sites this morning for events on the weekend. Kim R has no dates past Saturday on her calendar,, but she will be at the Ribfest, perhaps she is taking the day off? CH and Peter (her hubby not Delanty?) are taking in the Long Lunch at Warkworth and Andrew M is going to a "Politics, Tea and Coffee" in Trenton Saturday and on Sunday he, presumably because the email sent to announce the agenda says, "My family will also be in Warkworth on Sunday to..." is also going with his family. So folks be prepared to see entourages of handshakers working the tables.

Kudos to the Editor of the NNews - Dwight Irwin, when confronted with the dilemma of only finding one photo that related to the Community Centre issue, that of Cobourg Pols, when he really wanted a pic with a Y connection to add colour to a lead story, he ran with it. but later found a more suitable one. After mild criticism and a suggestion that by running the pic it could be inferred that the Town had a part in the story, which it didn't, he dug deeper and found a pic with a purely Y base to it - good for him.

A local view of the Frink situation

All the credit for this goes to Mr W Keeler of Cobourg

This project is still not clear to the public

The YMCA is reported to be still waiting for a reply to its application, story here for funding for a 9.9 million dollar project that would see an aquatic centre places side by side to the new Community Centre. The linkage between the Y and the Town's project is not clear, the finances and cost benefits and the future operating costs are murky.
If the Y gets a successful answer then presumably they will have to fund raise for their $3.3 million contribution. Put that on top of the $2.7 million that the Town is looking for and Cobourgers will be asked to raise $6.0 million dollars in eighteen months or risk raising more to cover bridge financing costs. Add to that the loss of revenue that the Town could face if the land that the Y wants to build on is handed over for nothing not to mention the money that is now given to the Y to sustain the present building, which may become surplus.
In these pages there has been a history of non-support for the Y, especially about the aquatic centre and we believe that is reflective of some public opinion. The Y has a long way to go to persuade some people that the fees to use the present facilities are not expensive and also the subsidy programme doesn't work as well as it should for lower income people. Thereby creating the impression that the Y is a private club. One of the reasons that the Community Centre will work is that it is not a private club that will be expensive to use, or so people believe.
Council should come clean with this linkage and explain just how much it is costing Cobourg to link with the Y and the reason for doing so. And if there is any hint of public money or assets being handed over at less than market cost we should know about it as taxpayers.
Incidentally in the story from the Northumberland News the headline is matched to a picture of the Mayor and Chair of the Community Centre project committee looking at the land to be used by the Town - nothing to do with the Y story! The implication here is that the Y has Town support. If this is the case the writer should have have explored the connection or dismissed it as speculative. Either way the picture lends weight to the suggestion that the Town is up to something.

amendment to the pic situation My friend D Irwin (editor of the Northumberland News) has made the comment that this pic was taken from the library to illustrate the story. Problem is, and I understand why that pic was used, that inferences can be drawn from the fact that it's a pic of the Town in a story about the Y.

I wonder how Kim and Andrew feel now?

Yesterday the Herrington campaign issued a glitzy pdf newsrelease which contained this image of a paragraph. Peter Delanty was endorsing Christine Herrington! Did he appear at the recent meetings, that the other candidates put on, to put in an appearance or to inwardly smirk about his choice? The perception of power converging to keep power.
Just look at who are are the key endorsements and you will understand that certain people who have held municipal office obviously think that they are important enough to try to influence others. Hasbeen Forrest Rowden - a former Mayor of Hamilton Twp, who remembers him today? A still serving Warden of Prince Edward County County, who knows him in NQW? Also listed on the team is Don Dudley from Warkworth, a Don Quixote of Liberal politics, it will be interesting to see if any of these lightweights can pull any weight.

On the other hand will Kim keep this pic, really bad body language here, up on her site now?
BTW Kim's number is now 287

You want a real Delanty smile here try this

Just imagine this woman, if she wins sitting, (story here) beside Bill Murdoch and Randy Hillier at Queen's Park!!

A stratagem of confusion

As of 7am this morning this was the logo displayed on Kim Rudd's website. Contacting a member of the team I was told that this was the number of "new supporters" that Kim has signed up. But is it real or is it just a strategy designed to scare off the other sides? Apparently this kind of thing hasn't been done before as it could be dangerous if expectations are unmet and also because it may tip off the others, there are only so many "new supporters" around and everyone is chasing them.

At the beginning of the campaign, so I have been told, the Riding membership was at about 1400. Now how many of the 1400 were paid-up and how many were lapsed but still on the rolls is unknown to us, but I know from other political parties members are kept on the lists for at least four years before being removed. So to say we have 1400 members may only be half true. But back to the "New supporters" (NS) and that definition. We can assume that a paid up member is an "old supporter" therefore new signups are NS, but lapsed members are also counted as NS. Do we count commitments made by people contacted on the phone or people being spoken to at wine and cheese parties as NS? And really how much do we want to tell the other side? Only a truly naive campaign would give away its numbers before the nomination meeting! An experienced campaign team would want to come into a nomination with a hundred or so signed memberships not previously declared. At the last big Liberal nomination nobody divulged numbers and so it wasn't until the day of the meeting anybody knew what anybody else had.

But back to the present. If one assumes (very dangerous) that about a thousand people will turn up to vote the winner would need would need about 600 signed members to feel confident. Kim Rudd is at 241 new ones, some old ones and a long way to go for the 600.

Still on Liberal affairs. A comment came in last night and was buried about three pages down so I copied it and repeat it here because it is timely
"It is about a week into the campaign for Chris Herrington and I hear that the memberships are rolling in across the riding. People know a winner and she has won as a councillor and twice as mayor...the other two have NO political experience at all!
Fancy brochures and get-to-gethers with out of area props should be easily seen as a weak way of saying I have the local Liberal support"

I was sent the Herrington website URL "www.chrisherrington.ca", a couple of days back and posted it, and an email was sent asking for a list of events that CH was planning - yet to hear anything back. So if anybody on the CH team reads this we would like to know what you are up to apart from a flashy website!

What do the Gen Xers and Gen Yers think about politics?

As a result of observing many Town Hall meetings and two recent nomination get togethers I am appalled at the lack of response to politics by anybody other than the old! Political opinions are like stinky feet: everybody has them and some smell worse than others. Consequently all should participate in Civics, but don't. Commenting on the age of the audience of political events is a dangerous thing as one is likely to offend those who think they are ageless and also those who usually don't mingle with older folk easily. But one cannot avoid the topic - it is rare to find a person of younger-middle age at any of these events. They are are elsewhere and those in that demographic will readily tell you that they don't have time, or the inclination to get involved. A lot of sympathy goes to the candidates for the Liberal nomination, who are running around trying to cater to their grandparents' generation - a difficult task. It is tough for callow youth to understand the generational difference and I wish them well, although the phrase, "Don't teach your father how to procreate" comes to mind.
It is telling, that in this age of modern politics, Andrew McFadyen has a Marketing Director on his campaign team. This guy looks about twenty five years old and I am sure that he has degrees coming out of his ying-yang and is eminently qualified to sell soap, but what will he be doing to encourage his generation to get involved in politics?
I am young enough, if I live as long as the National average, to see this question answered - what will the political participant of the future look like when the present political activists, whose average age appears to be seventy three are gone?

I can't hold back any longer, the "fountain" in the park is a pond with a tiny aerator. What happened to the fountain we were supposed to have? And costs will go up because we'll have to have a security guard at the pond to stop kids playing in it since it's not chlorinated and has been declared a health hazard. Small signs will just get ignored. Over the first week or so of operation, birds, dogs and drunks as well as kids with and without diapers have been seen in the water.

Peter Delanty was heard describing to a citizen how he expected something more like a real fountain but it remains to be seen if he'll actually do anything about it. I must admit the rink worked well in winter but we were promised a fountain for the summer as well. The pond design is clever but will be prone to vandalism - already one repair was needed when a park bench was thrown in.

And thanks to Ben for opening his blog for my occasional contribution.

Kim Rudd met some supporters yesterday at the Market building in Cobourg. Small crowd-small room, medium crowd-medium room and large crowd-large room; so goes the mantra. Well the Market Building is not small and not big so the crowd was a respectable number, less than Andrew's crowd but all these folks were from Cobourg and didn't drive in - about fifty all told and more people under the age of sixty - just.

A summery crowd and summery crowds don't expect long political speeches and they didn't get one. When I told Kim that Andrew had spoken for nine minutes she said, "I'll be shorter." After an introduction by Penny "I haven't read your blog as much as I have in these last three weeks" Crawford, Kim got down to business. Laying her personal life bare and outlining her CV and then tying those two topics to a pledge, "I intend to what I have been doing and take it to a higher level." That higher level is the big sandbox of Federal Politics where she sees a lack of recognition for the Riding's ills. Citing her experience, as the President of the local Chamber of Commerce, she explains, "We have to do business differently." as well as calling for an improvement to the volunteer community. Her political agenda will be to create "Healthy Communities".

Impressions that stayed after I had left: the party establishment was not present but the young turks were - Peter Cleary, armed with DSLR was obviously snapping pics for the Facebook and website content. One onlooker told me that Kim had "edge" and he thought that was a good sign. One sign of voters searching for choices as opposed to voter confirmation, was a man leaving the hall as I was going in - he had been to see Andrew and was still looking for a decision. And more importantly for Kim was that the membership signup table was busy. Finally; another capable candidate. But, if I were an uncommitted Liberal I would want to see them all in campaign mode as opposed to the kissy kissy stuff that is necessary for a nomination. The real test is twofold, more signups that the other guys and a barnburner of a speech at the nomination meeting.

Yesterday Andrew McFadyen came to town, and Kim Rudd must have passed him on County Rd 29 as she went out to Warkworth, (one of Andrew's home bases) to drink wine. But I went to see Andrew, Kim can wait until she does Cobourg on Saturday.

In a celebration of the past Andrew introduced himself to many of his supporters at the Best Western at 5pm. Speaking for nine minutes, after an hour of mingling, he paid homage to the party elders, attacked the sitting government and spoke about why he was running to be the candidate.

Introduced by the Rt Hon Christine Stewart, who started her address with, "All Liberals are looking forward to an election" she spoke about Andrew in the most glowing of terms. Andrew then thanked all of his predecessors profusely , praising Paul Macklin, but avoided sanctifying him, praised his campaign team for five months of hard work and then pointed out to the seventy-five or so party faithful that the sitting government of Mr Harper, represented by Rick Norlock, has been unresponsive to the needs of the Riding and must be changed. He then explained his passion for the position by explaining some of his childhood, experienced under the Harris Tories, had made him much stronger and independent - he was raised in a one-parent family home by a mother on disability. Consequently he had to work eight hour shifts at the age of fourteen. As he implied that the Harper cons are the same as the Harrisites, he obviously doesn't want any part of that kind of society and "wants to be an advocate for your needs."

My impressions of the event are simple, with the number of people, in the audience, under the age of sixty able to be counted on one hand Andrew had better hope that they get a quick election, some of them might not make it. A local Liberal mentioned to me that about half the audience was from out of town and I didn't recognise too many local folks either. Andrew scores highly for motivation and sincerity as well as being well connected with the party brass. So first impressions make him stand out as a capable candidate. But as another local Lib said, "We are so lucky to have three good candidates running." My money is still on who has signed up the most - it's a numbers game as many minds were not changed by this event.

Congratulations to the readers, you made yesterday the most active of all pages in our history. Without releasing actual numbers, they would scare the opposition, the discussion about the cheeky chappy and the zealous cop, who happened to be female, released the opinion dogs and drove up the hits.