We thought we had settled this debate years ago

January 27, 2012
By

Who and What is a person? This basic question is of the utmost importance given a bylaw that has been written for Monday's Council meeting. In a bylaw written to regulate safer sidewalks Council has decided to ban anything that travels on wheels except strollers and wheelchairs. These devices seem to us at the BR to be reasonable exceptions but only if the "wrinklies on trikes" will slow down or use their horns as they speed along safer sidewalks.

 

Click on image to enlarge

 

The problem is that in the list of definitions in the preamble to the bylaw a "person" is not defined. We do know that "who is a person?" was settled many years ago I guess it has been assumed by the writers of the bylaw. But that leads to contradiction if one reads the bylaw as it is written. Clause 3 says that a "person" shall have control of a child riding on the sidewalk, and clause 4 then bans all "persons" from riding on the sidewalk – is a child a person? Maybe a huge legal problem here if kids can't ride their bikes on sidewalks.

 

We know that men and women are 'persons' read here how women became so but forgive us for  reading the bylaw as it is written. We hope that some clarification will be apparent on Monday evening and that the people who read this today and work at City Hall – we know who you are – will pass this concern on to the drafter of the bylaw.

PDF    Send article as PDF   

You can do your bit!

January 26, 2012
By

As most newswatchers know a pretty ugly LOCKOUT is happening right now in London Ont. Caterpillar Equipment, the largest maker of construction and mining equipment in the world has decided cut the wages of one its Plant's workers in half.

 

 

It can't be because they are a poor Company according to the Toronto Star "The Illinois-based company announced Thursday that fourth-quarter earnings jumped 60 per cent. Caterpillar reported net income of $1.55 billion (all figures U.S.), or $2.32 per share, up from $968 million, or $1.47 per share last year." So what is it? The only answer must be – "because we can".

 

 

How do we deal with the behaviour of bullies? With disdain and a complete understanding of the behaviour – it will happen in the absence of resistance. Also in the Toronto Star today was a column written by Reg Cohn, their Provincial Affairs columnist. He is suggesting that the Province should use their clout to tell Caterpillar their behaviour is unacceptable. He also suggests that as Ontario, and Canada are big users of the equipment suggestions of a boycott might be helpful to a resolution.

 

 

We at the BR would go further and state unequivocally that a boycott is the only way to go. Every local Municipality and Provincial government should be pressured not make any capital expenditures on infrastructure or plant equipment coming from Caterpiller until this LOCKOUT is settled. So all you Council watchers out there should be looking at the upcoming capital budgets for such purchases. Every Council in the County should be asked to sign on to a moratoriam on purchasing Caterpiller products and each Council should be told by activists and others who are offended by Caterpillaer not to even think about spendiing one bloody red cent with such a Company until they change their policies.

PDF    Send article as PDF   

Another look at a report

January 25, 2012
By

Having a pile of time to kill and surfing the net the agenda of this week's COW meeting in Cobourg popped up in my Firefox. Hoping to find some reference to the report that Cobourg is going to commit to a sidewalk clearing policy, it wasn't there, but what was there was a mighty fine report – the final report and Action Plan for the Economic Development strategy for the next four years. This 100 page report can be found here  in pages 26 to 126. The Consultant certainly has put together a report with unintended consequences. We hope that he has copyrights. As the info in this paper is well researched and probably the most thorough that I have seen for the price in twenty five years of civic participation. Thhis paper will be used by all researchers for the next two years at least. The intern that provided the statistics should get a medal!

 

 

But the implications in this report tell a tale of lost civic opportunity and lack of foresight as well as the looming crisis of changing demographics which will lead to taxpayer revolt. The report outliines three problems:

 

 

  • The Town has a higher population of older adults than the norm
  • The Town has a smaller number of students in school than the norm
    . Those students who get out of school and stay in Town are less educated than the norm
  • The Town's industrial base has as its largest component manufacturing, in a world that is losing manufacturing to offshore

 

So what can the Town do to offset these problems? A lot according to the report, however none of it is proven to work, so spend money on spec. One of the recommendations is to hire more staff to fill the ED office. A researcher/data person and a Business Attraction Expert (BAE). If hiring more people is the answer then we have to be creative in how we pay for them, the researcher/data person will have to come out of the global budget and other departments monies, the BAE should be paid on commission (a very hefty commission) and with approved expenses to come out of the ED office and Mayor's budget after all if the BAE is going to perform the job of the Town's saleman surely the Mayor will be doing less and his office should pay for the transfer of responsibility.

 

 

Another part of the report recommends that Downtown revitalisation be revived. To that end Council has adopted a report that says a seven member committee be setup to initiate renewal. 3 DBIA people, 2 Chamber people, 1 Council member, 3 Town staff to act as resource people and 1 member from the Business Advisory Centre of N'land.

 

 

Looking at this composition it seems to be very heavy with bureaucrats and paid staff. Where are the creative juices going to come from and how much public debate will happen. The DBIA has had a very introverted and parochial way of looking at big schemes, and deepsixing them, in the past thirty years. If all this committee will do is to peer review best practises then we need a very good researcher and little else. The DBIA's complaint over the years is that their ideas, when they want to do something, say existing rules and the lack of money will defeat them. Also we have had many reports done in the past as well as a magnificent study done by some guy from Ryerson (Frank G if you read this tell me who he was). One of the main gripes by previous renewers was that those wanting renewal couldn't make the owners of the downtown properties clean up their buildings, leaky soffets and bad maintenance being the perennial problem. We don't believe that those problems have been worked on lately. But the big problem is how can this committee crank up the collective juices of the many who have an opinion about renewal when we have been down this road many times before, with little success?

 

PDF Creator    Send article as PDF   

Women Are Here To Stay

January 23, 2012
By

First off, a disclaimer. I am female. I was born that way. Yet, I am not prone to painting my face or fingernails and have little use for fashion. As a self professed tomboy, even though I was born in 1949 and spent my early childhood in the conformity zone of the 1950s, my existence was not curtailed or constrained by the prevailing mores of the times.  Not that my mother didn't try, but despite her best efforts to compel me to act like a "young lady", my father's belief in me as a human being who could do anything, anything at all, without limits, prevailed and grew in me as time passed. It is to him that I owe my stubborn refusal to sit in the back of the bus, as it were. Along with teaching me to read and print before I got to school-age, he also taught me that I was as good, and as worthy, as any man.

 

Now, for those wondering about that bit of personal disclosure, it seems like the right prelude to what comes next. After the recent storm of criticism hurled at the Burd Report, and at me in particular, my perception of being picked on for the crime of being female can be ignored no longer. Searching online for sexism in the blogging world, the first thing I learned was that this phenomenom is quite real, it is not just a product of my imagination. Other women bloggers have encountered it too, and a series on that topic was recently written in England by Helen Lewis Hasteley in the New Statesman. Titled "You should have your tongue ripped out": the reality of sexist abuse online" it was posted on November 3, 2011. Here's what my new pal had to say:

 

"The sheer volume of sexist abuse thrown at female bloggers is the internet's festering sore: if you talk to any woman who writes online, the chances are she will instantly be able to reel off a greatest hits of insults. But it's very rarely spoken about, for both sound and unsound reasons. No one likes to look like a whiner — particularly a woman writing in male-dominated fields such as politics, economics or computer games. Others are reluctant to give trolls the "satisfaction" of knowing they're emotionally affected by the abuse or are afraid of incurring more by speaking out".

 

That's just an excerpt, but you get the drift, and I repeat it here because it reflects my own feelings so well. This post has been percolating in my head for over a year now, but it has remained unwritten for the same reasons Ms. Lewis Hasteley listed. I know full well a heap of abuse will fall on my head as soon as this is published, and I can even predict what form that abuse will take.  Frankly, I am tired of it. Criticism of the content of a post is one thing, and anybody who blogs knows to expect it.  But criticism that's personal, that has no basis in logic or reason and serves no purpose other than belittling the writer, is another.  I'm tired of excusing it, tired of trying to figure out how on earth I've offended the commenter, tired of apologising for my crime in being a thinking, functioning female;  I'm just plain fed up.

 

It seems to me that my generation is filled with males whose self esteem seems to depend on feeling superior to women.  Further, like so many other women, I am just not willing to defer to these men in order to shore up their insecurities.  As a female my brain is just as sharp, just as good as any man's, my opinions just as valid.  So these insecure little boys can take a hike, the insults and put-downs will not scare me away, not stop me from writing, no matter what. Like it or lump it, we females are not going away.  We are taking our place beside men as fully functioning human beings, with just as much strength and courage. And guys, if this post makes you furious, that's a pretty good indication you may be one of the boys with a problem.

Free PDF    Send article as PDF   

Green Technology?

January 23, 2012
By

One of the things that gets our backs up at the BR is the way governments, of all stripes, will sell out long term potential for short term gain. A great example of this is the Harbourfront development in Cobourg, All of the land mass has been allowed to grow into condos which has put the area out of reach as a people place, unless you count boatwatching as an active sport. What could have become a vibrant public space with open theatre places and forums and commercial space (if one wants to see the potential that was available one should check local landscape architect Mike Hubicki's file for his Harbour Plan circa 1987) has become pathways for pedestrians and bicycles. This happened as a result of pressure from developers and from the DBIA refusing to acknowledge that the Main Central Commercial Area should have been expanded.

 

 

This behaviour has come about for two reasons – the pols demand for instant results to be used as benchmarks for their municipal competence and the bureaucrats desire for more tax revenue. For too long we in Cobourg had a finance guy, who later became the CAO who's raison d'etre was the drive to build anything so that he could get the taxes to finance the Town. This drive for building will bankrupt us in the long run. For instance the move to build new housing East of Brook Rd is reckless when you consider the servicing and maintenance costs compared to the alternative – the potential for 11,000 new residents inside the existing town lines if the land was infilled.

 

 

What's the previous paras have to do with "Green Technology" (GT). As long as the former Kraft site is going to be incorrectly named the "Cobourg Innovation Centre" instead of the "Cobourg Industrial waste and recycling Centre" We will continue to point out that little innovation is taking place there. This former state of the art food processing facility is now going to be the home of waste reprocessing. And to make it worse the public is being bamboozled by the label being applied to it by very clever proponents. Green Technology is the term used by all of the proponents in any of the many press releases about Companies that will setting up shop in these buildings.

 

Wikipedia defines GT as – Environmental technology (abbreviated as envirotech) or green technology (abbreviated as greentech) or clean technology (abbreviated as cleantech) is the application of one or more of environmental science, green chemistry, environmental monitoring and electronic devices to monitor, model and conserve the natural environment and resources, and to curb the negative impacts of human involvement.

 

Apply that definition to the description of the newest industry to come to Town and ask yourself if a plant that takes recycled glass and pounds and grinds and reduces those bottles to dust is one that fits, or is it just a PR label to make an industry a couple of thousand years old sexy and new?

 

The point of this post is to illustrate that an Industry that is coming to town is being hailed as something it isn't (a GT company) and also to point out that facility like the former Kraft building is being wasted by being filled up with industries that recycle garbage, there are better places for these enterprises. So our appeal to the proponents and reporters is simple – be truthful in your reporting and erroneous images will not be perpetuated.

 

Create PDF    Send article as PDF   

More Peanut Butter Economics

January 21, 2012
By

Two contrasting headlines caught my attention today in my regular perusal of online media. First, the Toronto Star carried a CP item and titled it “Inflation in Canada Drops As Prices Fall for Food and Gas“. Meanwhile, the press release issued by StatsCan, and printed in Northumberland View, was titled “Consumer Prices Rise 2.3% in December“. Funny how the same information can generate such different headlines, but both are quoting the actual numbers. Seems the CP article`s title was focused on just the December results, and those prices had risen a bit less than in November, while the press release examined the numbers in many different ways over the whole year and the title reported a different aspect. Here`s what StatsCan had to say for the entire year:

 

Annual review of the 2011 Consumer Price Index
In 2011, the annual average increase in consumer prices was 2.9%, following a 1.8% rise in 2010. The faster growth in 2011 was largely attributable to higher prices for gasoline and food. The 2011 increase was slightly higher than the annual average growth rates observed in the early 2000s.

 

That paragraph is the one that tells the tale for me, although the government looks at prices in many different ways, excluding some items in some measures, like food and gasoline, but including them in others.  But for me, what counts is the tally at the grocery store, and certainly food costs have risen noticeably over 2011. Weekly specials seem to feature more processed, cheap filler foods while meat deals are harder to find, and cheaper cuts are now selling for what the expensive ones cost not so long ago. There are still good deals here and there, and I`ve had many fine conversations about inflation and the economy while browsing over the choices at the local food emporiums.   Right now the price of broccoli is alarming me, along with hamburger and hot dog rolls that cost almost as much as the stuff we put in them. 

 

Another new development at the grocery stores is the empty shelves where products, and especially advertised specials, should be. Whether this is simply a “just in time“ inventory system gone too far, an actual problem in securing foodstuffs from the next level, or some clever bait and switch marketing tool is anybody`s guess, but something is going on. At Shopper`s Drug Mart in both Cobourg and Port Hope, it`s routine to find they`re out of whatever food specials are advertised, but I`ve learned to ask for them, and quite often the stock is there, buried in the back of the store.  A strange way to do business, but then I`m no accountant either.

 

For the statistically minded among us, the full report, or at least the lengthy press release from StatsCan is the place to go for examining this topic, but for mugs like me, a few trips to the various grocery stores are all that`s needed to see that consumer prices are up. And up and up.

Free PDF    Send article as PDF   

Can Blogs be Impartial?

January 20, 2012
By

The very nature of Blogs, online publications and opinions lead the readers to judge for themselves a perception of bias. For example we find that when one listens to 'talk-radio' the majority of listeners will complain about the left-wing bias of the media, without providing any proof. The CBC is damned by the "Right" as being a rat's nest of leftie and commies and yet will not provide proof. For example Rick Salutin debunked that premise weeks ago by stating that the top rated shows contain nobody of a recognisable leftie bent. Peter Mansbridge's analysis panel contains no lefties, Andrew Coyne, and Allen Gregg and any combination of two more will not have a leftie bias and that the 'elder statesman of comment' is Rex Murphy – a very caustic and conservative commentator. These shows are put up and bend over backwards to contain balance. That's what is expected from a PUBLIC Broadcaster. Can you get the same from any other newspaper funded by corporations who are inherently biased to the right. SunMedia not only does not make any pretense of supplying both sides of an argument but will in some cases bend the truth to their convenience.

 

 

Two weeks ago the Washington Post decried the problem of supplying balance when ninety percent of the news is driven from the right and marketed as entertainment. It is in this context where a commentator accused a member of the BR to be a person who writes hate-speech. This is total rubbish but in that context the poster was guilty of taking sides in the "Left-Right" debate about issues that have become the norm in the MSM.

 

 

The basic question for us at the BurdReport is very simple, can we present an issue as seen from both sides and still be opinionated about the issue. In other words what kind of publication is the BR when it presents both sides and produces a conclusion in the same post. Also what happens if the readers then disagree with the writing and the conclusive opinion? Under normal circumstances a sane reader would not come back because they don't like the consistent writings or they do come back to harangue the poster in the comments section.

 

The bottom line for us is simple, we have been around for long enough to know that our opinions are not mainstream, may be difficult to read for some people and entertaining for others. Take it or leave it folks we ain't changing. But be reassured that when you accuse the writer of being 'hate-based' then be prepared to be told off or have your comments taken down. It may be upsetting to us to realise that we are not the most easily liked of opinionators but we can live with it despite some vociforous and snarky comments to the contrary.

PDF Printer    Send article as PDF   

Try something novel for a change

January 19, 2012
By

With the news that a "no-board report" has been issued to the City of Toronto it is now obvious that a labour disruption will happen on February 5th. As the Union is stating that it doesn't want to strike and with Councillors (the right-wing anti-union ones) itching for a lock-out perhaps it is tiime to show that the problem is all the City's problem.

For the past one hundred years the game has been the same. As soon as the deadline is reached forty-five gallons drums get rolled out, filled with combustibles and set on fire. Ramshackle tents and portakabins appear at demarcation lines and as many as can be mustered howling union members walk around in circles with placards around their necks chanting slogans – that is so yesterday. Thus the stereotype of ugly workers is perpetuated. This is a suggestion to Mark Ferguson, President of the soon to be locked out Local 416 CUPE. Don't fall for the same old crap – you have a Masters Degree and should be more cerebral than Jimmy Hoffa. We suggest the following actions.

 

 

  1. Do not have any members at any gate performing picket duty
  2. Do not light any barrels, do not set up squatters camps
  3. Do not leave the bargaining table under any circumstances whatsoever
  4. If the City walks out on you proceed to the nearest TV camera and demand that the City meet with you
  5. Buy as much TV time as you can to proclaim that you are willing to bargain at any time
  6. Create the perception that the City is not bargaining when you are willing to do so
  7. Provide a rational defence of the main issue "bumping rights" even if it means parading the sick and lame who will be fired and not allowed to bump into jobs they can perform. Do not allow one healthy person to explain the predicament and the issue.
  8. Explain how "jobs for life is a lie created by Management

 

If you can get half of this across to the people who do not drool on the pages of the "Sun" as they quaff donuts you will have won. At least you will have fought the intelligent fight.

PDF Creator    Send article as PDF   

Victories for Our Side

January 18, 2012
By

While bad news is usually what fuels blogs and other media, sometimes good news takes the stage and it behooves us to celebrate when that happens. Today is one of those days on two fronts.

 

First, President Obama has denied the application of TransCanada Corporation to build their Keystone Pipeline from Alberta down to points in the United States. Refusing to cave in to what he called a "rushed and arbitrary deadline" imposed by the Republican Congress, Obama said the State Department needs more time to evaluate the project's impact on the environment and people. While admiting only to disappointment, the Harper gang has already hinted they'll just find another buyer for their dirty oil. Like all peddlars of evil substances, our government insists it needs the money, and that trumps everything else. Our allies here and in the USA can all share a huge smile at this timely reminder that we can bring about change, even a whole continent at a time.

 

Next, we have the thrill of seeing an Omnibus bill that works for us just up the road in Toronto, where a coalition of centrist and lefties on City Council worked together for weeks to craft their motion. Presented and voted on yesterday, it prevented fifteen million dollars in cuts from happening in the city. With a narrow victory of 23 to 21 votes, the defiant Councillors saved pools, arenas, TTC services, homeless shelters and daycares from being axed or starved of operating funds. For a finale, a further five million in cuts was stopped in a separate, later motion. Mike del Grande, the budget guy who wanted to cut school breakfast programs, is sullking and musing publicly about resigning. To him, we say don't let the door hit you on the way out, and take the Mayor and his bully brother with you.

 

With Harper busy dismantling the traditions of community, mutual co-operation and diversity in Canada, and McGuinty about to drop Ontario into a world of hurt, with his bad cop pal Don Drummond delivering the news, we need all the victories we can get. If I had any scotch, I'd drink some, with a toast for Barak Obama and the twenty three Toronto councillors who saved the city from certain decay.

Create PDF    Send article as PDF   

SNOWBURDS In Mexico

January 18, 2012
By

Well, it's January again, and that means the Boss and his Boss, Doreen, have flown off to Mexico again. This time, they're staying a whole month, perhaps in celebration of Ben reaching retirement age fit enough to enjoy it. With trips to Italy and Ireland already under their belts during the last year, their packing skills must be about perfect by now.

 

As usual, Ben will continue blogging on his holiday website, which is linked at the top left of the main page. He promised, though, that he'll still be keeping an eye on Cobourg Town Council from his office on the beach, and we can expect an entry or two on the BR as well. I'll keep slogging away too, and hopefully we can continue to entertain and/or enrage our readers even without Ben's regular contributions. At least we'll do our best. Happy Holiday, Boss.

PDF Creator    Send article as PDF   
Page 1 of 40
1 2 3 40

RSS CBC livefeed

RSS AlterNet feed

google ads

Bad Behavior has blocked 268 access attempts in the last 7 days.